MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00256-025-05009-x

Медицинская библиотека · Skeletal radiology · 2025

Evaluating diagnostic consistency: intra and interobserver agreement in rotator cuff tear classification using ultrasound videos.

Ghosh Shrimanti, Knight Jessica, Wichuk Stephanie, Akhlaq Natasha, Durham Daniel, Gallant Cassandra, McDonald Steel, Xie Michael, Verma Vedur, Man Vincent, Hareendranathan Abhilash R, Jaremko Jacob L

Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Ultrasound (US) is a more accessible alternative to MRI for rotator cuff tear (RCT) assessment. Rapid US can identify RCTs, but accurate US interpretation remains challenging, even for experts. We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study to evaluate intraobserver and interobserver agreement and accuracy in RCT detection with US between expert and non-expert readers.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Long-axis cine sweeps of supraspinatus tendon from 138 patients with suspected RCTs were analyzed and compared to corresponding MRI results (reference standard). Three non-experts (graduate student, medical student, radiology resident) and three experts (fellowship-trained musculoskeletal (MSK) radiologist, MSK sonographer, and radiology fellow) independently classified tendons as normal, full-thickness tear, or partial-thickness tear by predefined criteria.

RESULTS

For all-tear detection (ATD), expert accuracy (%) ranged from 68.8 (95% CI, 61.1-76.5) to 84.8% (78.8-90.9), and non-expert accuracy from 63.0 (54.9-71.1) to 79.7% (73.0-86.4). For full-thickness tear detection (FTTD), expert accuracy ranged from 75.4 (68.2-82.6) to 87.0% (81.4-92.6), and non-expert accuracy from 73.9 (66.6-81.2) to 79.0% (72.2-85.8). Interobserver agreement for ATD was moderate among experts (Light's kappa ( κ ) = 0.42 (95% CI, 0.30-0.58)) and fair among non-experts ( κ = 0.38 (0.32-0.50)). Intraobserver agreement was fair ( κ = 0.35 (0.29-0.43)). Our experts achieved higher sensitivity, resulting in improved overall accuracy.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound readers of all experience levels accurately identified over 80% of RCTs when compared with MRI. Expert readers achieved higher accuracy, sensitivity, and reliability than non-experts. Ultrasound reliably detects RCTs and remains the preferred imaging modality for its accessibility and patient comfort, underscoring the need for standardization, training, and technological improvements.

Для цитирования: Ghosh Shrimanti, Knight Jessica, Wichuk Stephanie, Akhlaq Natasha, Durham Daniel, Gallant Cassandra, McDonald Steel, Xie Michael, Verma Vedur, Man Vincent, Hareendranathan Abhilash R, Jaremko Jacob L. Evaluating diagnostic consistency: intra and interobserver agreement in rotator cuff tear classification using ultrasound videos.. Skeletal radiology. 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-025-05009-x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.