Neurosurgical focus · 2013
Analysis of interpeak latencies of brainstem auditory evoked potential waveforms during microvascular decompression of cranial nerve VII for hemifacial spasm.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Thirumala Parthasarathy D, Ilangovan Preethi, Habeych Miguel, Crammond Donald J, Balzer Jeffrey
Аннотация
OBJECT: Microvascular decompression (MVD) of the facial nerve is an effective treatment for patients with hemifacial spasm. Intraoperative monitoring of brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) during MVD can reduce the incidence of hearing loss. In this study the authors' goal was to evaluate changes in interpeak latencies (IPLs) of Waves I-V, Waves III-V, and Waves I-III of BAEP Waveforms I, III, and V during MVD and correlate them with postoperative hearing loss. To date, no such study has been performed. Hearing loss is defined as nonuseful hearing (Class C/D), which is a pure tone average of more than 50 dB and/or speech discrimination score of less than 50%.
METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective analysis of IPLs of BAEPs in 93 patients who underwent intraoperative BAEP monitoring during MVD. Patients who did not have hearing loss were in Class A/B and those who had hearing loss were in Class C/D.
RESULTS: Binary logistic regression analysis of independent IPL variables was performed. A maximum change in IPLs of Waves I-III and Waves I-V and on-skin change in IPLs of Waves I-V increases the odds of hearing loss. However, on adjusting the same variables for loss of response, change in IPLs did not increase the odds of hearing loss.
CONCLUSIONS: Changes in IPL measurements did not increase the odds of postoperative hearing loss. This information might be helpful in evaluating the value of IPLs as alarm criteria during MVD to prevent hearing loss.
METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective analysis of IPLs of BAEPs in 93 patients who underwent intraoperative BAEP monitoring during MVD. Patients who did not have hearing loss were in Class A/B and those who had hearing loss were in Class C/D.
RESULTS: Binary logistic regression analysis of independent IPL variables was performed. A maximum change in IPLs of Waves I-III and Waves I-V and on-skin change in IPLs of Waves I-V increases the odds of hearing loss. However, on adjusting the same variables for loss of response, change in IPLs did not increase the odds of hearing loss.
CONCLUSIONS: Changes in IPL measurements did not increase the odds of postoperative hearing loss. This information might be helpful in evaluating the value of IPLs as alarm criteria during MVD to prevent hearing loss.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Audiometry, Pure-ToneElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemFacial NerveFacial Nerve DiseasesHearing Loss, SensorineuralHemifacial SpasmHumansIncidenceIntraoperative ComplicationsMicrovascular Decompression SurgeryMonitoring, IntraoperativeNerve Compression SyndromesPostoperative CarePredictive Value of TestsPreoperative CareReaction TimeRetrospective StudiesVestibulocochlear NerveVestibulocochlear Nerve Injuries