MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1179/2045772311y.0000000008

Медицинская библиотека · The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2011

Efficacy of cranial electrotherapy stimulation for neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury: a multi-site randomized controlled trial with a secondary 6-month open-label phase.

Tan Gabriel, Rintala Diana H, Jensen Mark P, Richards J Scott, Holmes Sally Ann, Parachuri Rama, Lashgari-Saegh Shamsi, Price Larry R

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Chronic pain is a significant problem for many individuals following spinal cord injury (SCI). Unfortunately, SCI-related neuropathic pain has proven to be largely refractory to analgesic medications and other available treatments. Cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) has been effective in managing some types of pain. It involves the application of a small amount of current through the head via ear clip electrodes.

OBJECTIVE

Explore the effectiveness of CES for neuropathic pain in persons with SCI and chronic pain.

STUDY

DESIGN

Multi-site, double-blind, sham-controlled study.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults with SCI and chronic neuropathic pain at or below the level of injury were randomized to receive active or sham CES.

INTERVENTION: Application of active CES or sham CES 1 hour daily for 21 days. Six-month open-label phase to assess 'as-needed' CES use.

OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in pre- to post-session pain ratings as well as change in pain intensity, pain interference, pain quality, pain beliefs and coping strategies, general physical and mental health status, depressive symptomatology, perceived stress, and anxiety pre- to post-treatment.

RESULTS

The active group reported a significantly greater average decrease in pain during daily treatments than the sham group (Kruskal-Wallis chi-square = 4.70, P < 0.05). During the 21-day trial, there was a significant group × time interaction for only one outcome variable; the active group showed larger pre- to post-treatment decreases in pain interference than the sham group did (F = 8.50, P < 0.01, d = 0.59).

CONCLUSIONS

On average, CES appears to have provided a small but statistically significant improvement in pain intensity and pain interference with few troublesome side effects. Individual results varied from no pain relief to a great deal of relief.

Для цитирования: Tan Gabriel, Rintala Diana H, Jensen Mark P, Richards J Scott, Holmes Sally Ann, Parachuri Rama, Lashgari-Saegh Shamsi, Price Larry R. Efficacy of cranial electrotherapy stimulation for neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury: a multi-site randomized controlled trial with a secondary 6-month open-label phase.. The journal of spinal cord medicine. 2011. DOI: 10.1179/2045772311y.0000000008.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.