European journal of radiology · 2009
Hypothenar hammer syndrome: Long-term follow-up of selective thrombolysis by 3.0-T MR angiography.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Friedrich Klaus M, Frühwald-Pallamar Julia, Stadlbauer Andreas, Salem Georg, Salomonowitz Erich
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term outcome of selective thrombolysis in patients with hypothenar hammer syndrome by 3.0-T magnetic resonance (MR) angiography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven patients (6 men, 1 woman; mean age, 58.6 +/- 14.4 years) were investigated. Long-term follow-up examinations (9-11 years post-interventional) were based on 3.0-T MR angiography. Pre- versus post-thrombolysis images and post-thrombolysis versus long-term follow-up images were compared with respect to arterial diameter. Additionally, changes in patients' symptoms were assessed.
RESULTS: The long-term follow-up examination showed worse contrast filling of the ulnar digits compared to the immediately post-interventional angiographic images only in one patient (14.3%), whereas worse contrast filling of the deep palmar arch or the ulnar artery was registered in three patients (42.9%). Three of seven patients (42.9%) reported worse symptoms, two patients (28.6%) stable symptoms at the long-term follow-up MR angiography. In two patients (28.6%) the change of symptoms could not be observed due to missing post-interventional clinical data.
CONCLUSIONS: At the long-term follow-up, clinically, mild progression was found rather often, whereas with respect to imaging findings progression at the ulnar digits was rare. We assume that collateral vessels might play a major role in the post-interventional follow-up. In many instances the patients' symptoms are not in line with the angiographic findings.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven patients (6 men, 1 woman; mean age, 58.6 +/- 14.4 years) were investigated. Long-term follow-up examinations (9-11 years post-interventional) were based on 3.0-T MR angiography. Pre- versus post-thrombolysis images and post-thrombolysis versus long-term follow-up images were compared with respect to arterial diameter. Additionally, changes in patients' symptoms were assessed.
RESULTS: The long-term follow-up examination showed worse contrast filling of the ulnar digits compared to the immediately post-interventional angiographic images only in one patient (14.3%), whereas worse contrast filling of the deep palmar arch or the ulnar artery was registered in three patients (42.9%). Three of seven patients (42.9%) reported worse symptoms, two patients (28.6%) stable symptoms at the long-term follow-up MR angiography. In two patients (28.6%) the change of symptoms could not be observed due to missing post-interventional clinical data.
CONCLUSIONS: At the long-term follow-up, clinically, mild progression was found rather often, whereas with respect to imaging findings progression at the ulnar digits was rare. We assume that collateral vessels might play a major role in the post-interventional follow-up. In many instances the patients' symptoms are not in line with the angiographic findings.