MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/fn.80.2.f135

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 1999

Prospective study of outcome in antenatally diagnosed renal pelvis dilatation.

Jaswon M S, Dibble L, Puri S, Davis J, Young J, Dave R, Morgan H

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIMS: To ascertain the outcome associated with antenatal renal pelvis dilatation; to recommend guidelines for postnatal investigation and determine an upper limit of normal for the anterioposterior dimensions of the fetal renal pelvis.

METHODS

Infants whose antenatal ultrasound scan showed a fetal renal pelvis of 5 mm or greater were investigated using postnatal renal tract ultrasound and a micturating cystogram. Isotope studies were also performed, where appropriate.

RESULTS

Vesicoureteric reflux (VUR), the most common diagnosis, was evident in 23/104 (22%). In 14 infants with VUR the postnatal ultrasound scan was normal. There was no evidence of renal scarring or dysplasia in any of the refluxing kidneys. Other diagnoses were pelviureteric junction obstruction, renal dysplasia, and idiopathic dilatation. Antenatal counselling and parental information facilitated postnatal assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Infants with antenatal renal pelvis measurements of 5 mm or greater should be investigated postnatally, as a significant percentage will have VUR. A normal postnatal ultrasound scan does not preclude the presence of VUR.

Для цитирования: Jaswon M S, Dibble L, Puri S, Davis J, Young J, Dave R, Morgan H. Prospective study of outcome in antenatally diagnosed renal pelvis dilatation.. Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition. 1999. DOI: 10.1136/fn.80.2.f135.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.