Fa yi xue za zhi · 2009
[Auditory P300 in the patients with traumatic brain injury].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cui Yong, Liu Fan, Zhang Xin-yuan, Tang Peng, Liu Peng, Zhang Biao, Liu Ji-hui
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the cognitive dysfunction in patients with the traumatic brain injury (TBI) by auditory P300.
METHODS: Auditory P300 was recorded in the normal subjects and patients with TBI at the active (foot pedal) and passive task.
RESULTS: In healthy persons, N2 and P3 in active task state showed higher amplitude than that in passive task state, and no significant prolongation of the latency. The amplitude of N1 and P2 at Cz was higher than that at Pz. In passive task state, N2 and P3 showed higher amplitude and longer latency in the patients than that in the healthy persons. N2 and P3 of the patients in the active task showed higher amplitude and longer latency than that in the passive task. Obvious change of P3 latency was observed in the patients with attention disorder.
CONCLUSION: The type of task mainly affect the amplitude of N2 and P3. The latency of N2 and P3 in passive task can be used as an indication for evaluating cognitive function in patients with diffuse brain injury.
METHODS: Auditory P300 was recorded in the normal subjects and patients with TBI at the active (foot pedal) and passive task.
RESULTS: In healthy persons, N2 and P3 in active task state showed higher amplitude than that in passive task state, and no significant prolongation of the latency. The amplitude of N1 and P2 at Cz was higher than that at Pz. In passive task state, N2 and P3 showed higher amplitude and longer latency in the patients than that in the healthy persons. N2 and P3 of the patients in the active task showed higher amplitude and longer latency than that in the passive task. Obvious change of P3 latency was observed in the patients with attention disorder.
CONCLUSION: The type of task mainly affect the amplitude of N2 and P3. The latency of N2 and P3 in passive task can be used as an indication for evaluating cognitive function in patients with diffuse brain injury.