International urogynecology journal · 2025
Assessment of Different Pubococcygeal Lines for the Quantitative Diagnosis of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Using Magnetic Resonance Defecography.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Min, Wang Sumei, Liu Tongtong, Liu Xiao
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to elucidate the clinical utility of two reference lines, the pubosacrococcygeal joint line (PCLjnt) and pubococcygeal joint line (PCLcc), in the quantitative diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and pelvic floor laxity.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of magnetic resonance defecography (MRD) in patients with stage II or above POP was conducted. POP and pelvic floor relaxation were quantitatively assessed using both PCLjnt and PCLcc as reference lines. Further research, point-to-point correlation analysis was performed between the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system and MRD to investigate the discrepancies between the two reference lines.
RESULTS: There was no significant statistical difference in the degree of cystocele and H line between the PCLjnt and PCLcc groups (p > 0.05). Nevertheless, significant differences in the degree of uterine prolapse and M-line between the two groups were observed (p = 0.00). Both the PCLjnt and PCLcc reference lines demonstrated better correlation with POP-Q, and the PCLcc exhibited slightly higher correlation coefficients than the PCLjnt.
CONCLUSIONS: The results revealed significant moderate correlations between both reference lines and key POP-Q landmarks. Both PCLjnt and PCLcc can be utilized for interpreting MRD images and diagnosing POP for anterior wall and uterine prolapse.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of magnetic resonance defecography (MRD) in patients with stage II or above POP was conducted. POP and pelvic floor relaxation were quantitatively assessed using both PCLjnt and PCLcc as reference lines. Further research, point-to-point correlation analysis was performed between the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system and MRD to investigate the discrepancies between the two reference lines.
RESULTS: There was no significant statistical difference in the degree of cystocele and H line between the PCLjnt and PCLcc groups (p > 0.05). Nevertheless, significant differences in the degree of uterine prolapse and M-line between the two groups were observed (p = 0.00). Both the PCLjnt and PCLcc reference lines demonstrated better correlation with POP-Q, and the PCLcc exhibited slightly higher correlation coefficients than the PCLjnt.
CONCLUSIONS: The results revealed significant moderate correlations between both reference lines and key POP-Q landmarks. Both PCLjnt and PCLcc can be utilized for interpreting MRD images and diagnosing POP for anterior wall and uterine prolapse.