MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1590/s1808-86942010000200006

Медицинская библиотека · Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology · 2010

Perilymphatic fistula in guinea pigs: natural evolution versus surgical treatment.

Onishi Ektor Tsuneo, Fukuda Yotaka

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: Perilymphatic fistulas still represent a major treatment challenge. In some cases, its surgical closure can reduce auditory and vestibular sequelae.

AIM: To compare the behavior of cochlear window perilymphatic fistulas in guinea pigs as to their natural evolution and immediate surgical closure.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Experimental study. Forty guinea pigs were submitted to cochlear window membrane lesion and randomly broken down into two groups: open fistula (OF) and surgically closed fistula (SCF). We found the summation potential (SP) and action potential (AP) latencies and amplitudes and the SP/AP ratio at three times: pre-fistula (PRE), immediate post-fistula (IPF) and late post-fistula (LPF).

RESULTS

There was a significant drop in amplitudes and raise in SP and AP latencies among the times studied. As to the SP/AP ratios, there was a reduction between PRE and IPF, both were significant. There was no behavior difference between the OF and SCF.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the time frame considered, guinea pigs submitted to cochlear window membrane lesions evolved with a worsening in potentials and latencies. Despite the partial improvement in electrophysiological parameters, surgical closure did not prove statistically more effective than natural evolution.

Для цитирования: Onishi Ektor Tsuneo, Fukuda Yotaka. Perilymphatic fistula in guinea pigs: natural evolution versus surgical treatment.. Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. 2010. DOI: 10.1590/s1808-86942010000200006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.