DOI 10.1080/03007995.2026.2726017
A retrospective cohort study on the comparative safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on the onset of gallbladder disease in type II diabetes.
Аннотация
BACKGROUNDS AND
OBJECTIVES
To assess and confirm the risk of gallbladder disease in Type II diabetes (T2D) patients treated with Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonist (GLP-1RA) compared to Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor (DPP-4I).
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
This is a retrospective cohort study using administrative claims. Adults who newly received either GLP-1RA or DPP-4I for T2D management were identified between 2016 and 2021. Study cohort included individuals naïve to gallbladder disease or relevant condition on or 6-month prior to the first GLP-1RA or DDP-4I dispensing date (Index). Cumulative incidence of gallbladder disease after the minimal follow-up period of the first 45 days was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to calculate hazard ratios of gallbladder disease for GLP-1RA vs. DPP-4I up to 2 years beyond the initial 45-day exposure.
RESULTS
The cohort included 135,197 GLP-1RA and 118,919 DPP-4I patients with minor diabetes complication profiles. Cumulative incidence of gallbladder disease at 1 year was 1.286% (GLP-1RA) vs. 1.054% (DPP-4I); at 2 years, it was 2.181% vs. 2.039%. Adjusting for the baseline characteristics, the respective HR (95% CI) was 1.241 (95% CI, 1.104-1.393) at 1 year and 1.176 (95% CI, 1.061-1.304) at 2 years.
CONCLUSION
A moderate but significant increase in the risk of gallbladder disease was confirmed from the real-world population receiving GLP‑1 RA compared with DPP‑4I. This confirmed risk underscores the need for ongoing monitoring and surveillance for gallbladder disease during GLP‑1RA therapy.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.