Zhonghua bing li xue za zhi = Chinese journal of pathology · 1997
[The expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen in breast phylloides cystosarcoma and its significance].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Niu Y, Fu X, Zhao Y
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in breast phylloides cystosarcoma and its clinicopathological signification.
METHODS: Immunohistochemistry (SP method) with monoclonal antibodies PC10 against PCNA was performed in 100 cases of phylloides cystosarcoma and 39 cases of adenofibroma.
RESULTS: The positive rate of PCNA in phylloides cystosarcoma was 86%. The average PCNA index (PI) of phylloides cystosarcoma was significantly different among every histologic grading (F = 85.33, P < 0.01). The degree of differentiation was lower, the PI was higher. The PI was closely correlated with histologic grading (r's = 0.77). The PI in grade I phylloides cystosarcoma was higher than that in the group of adenofibroma with abundant mesenchymal cells (t = 3.42, P < 0.01). There was only a low correlation between PI and mitotic figures in phylloides cystosarcoma (r = 0.39).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the detection of PCNA has considerable practical value in reflecting the proliferation of activity of phylloides cystosarcoma, assisting the pathologists to make histologic grading; distinguishing the malignancy from benign ones (differential diagnosis) and evaluating the prognosis.
METHODS: Immunohistochemistry (SP method) with monoclonal antibodies PC10 against PCNA was performed in 100 cases of phylloides cystosarcoma and 39 cases of adenofibroma.
RESULTS: The positive rate of PCNA in phylloides cystosarcoma was 86%. The average PCNA index (PI) of phylloides cystosarcoma was significantly different among every histologic grading (F = 85.33, P < 0.01). The degree of differentiation was lower, the PI was higher. The PI was closely correlated with histologic grading (r's = 0.77). The PI in grade I phylloides cystosarcoma was higher than that in the group of adenofibroma with abundant mesenchymal cells (t = 3.42, P < 0.01). There was only a low correlation between PI and mitotic figures in phylloides cystosarcoma (r = 0.39).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the detection of PCNA has considerable practical value in reflecting the proliferation of activity of phylloides cystosarcoma, assisting the pathologists to make histologic grading; distinguishing the malignancy from benign ones (differential diagnosis) and evaluating the prognosis.