European journal of radiology · 2024
Magnetic resonance defecography: Post-defecation straining detects more and maximal prolapse in the anterior and middle compartments.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ye Pengfei, Ning Gang, Cui Tao, Niu Xiaoyu, Bao Li, Wu Jing, Zhang Heng
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare pre-defecation straining without rectal gel and post-defecation straining with the defecation phase, and to investigate their roles in evaluating pelvic organ prolapse (POP).
MATERIAL & METHODS: Magnetic Resonance Defecography (MRD) images of 65 patients with a clinical diagnosis of POP were retrospectively reviewed by two independent readers. Measurements were taken at rest, pre-defecation straining without rectal gel, defecation, and post-defecation straining. The presence, sizes, and/or grades of cystocele, uterovaginal prolapse, widened levator hiatus, perineal descent, cul-de-sac hernia, rectocele, and rectal intussusception were evaluated and compared across the four phases.
RESULTS: Compared to pre-defecation straining, both defecation and post-defecation straining detected more cases, larger sizes, and higher grades of prolapse in all compartments. When comparing defecation and post-defecation straining, the latter diagnosed four more cases of cystocele (80 % vs 73.9 %, p = 0.2) with larger size (-34.1 vs -29.0, p < 0.01) and higher grade (p = 0.19). Post-defecation straining also identified eight more cases of uterovaginal prolapse (89.2 % vs 73.9 %, p < 0.01) with larger size (-32.9 vs -26.4, p < 0.01) and higher grade (p < 0.01) compared to defecation. Conversely, defecation detected eight more cases of rectocele (46.2 % vs 33.9 %, p < 0.01) with larger size (9.2 vs 6.2 cm, p < 0.01) and higher grade (p = 0.26).
CONCLUSION: Post-defecation straining effectively depicts the maximal extent of prolapse in the anterior and middle compartments, and should be performed whenever there is a clinical need for a comprehensive assessment of prolapse in these compartments.
MATERIAL & METHODS: Magnetic Resonance Defecography (MRD) images of 65 patients with a clinical diagnosis of POP were retrospectively reviewed by two independent readers. Measurements were taken at rest, pre-defecation straining without rectal gel, defecation, and post-defecation straining. The presence, sizes, and/or grades of cystocele, uterovaginal prolapse, widened levator hiatus, perineal descent, cul-de-sac hernia, rectocele, and rectal intussusception were evaluated and compared across the four phases.
RESULTS: Compared to pre-defecation straining, both defecation and post-defecation straining detected more cases, larger sizes, and higher grades of prolapse in all compartments. When comparing defecation and post-defecation straining, the latter diagnosed four more cases of cystocele (80 % vs 73.9 %, p = 0.2) with larger size (-34.1 vs -29.0, p < 0.01) and higher grade (p = 0.19). Post-defecation straining also identified eight more cases of uterovaginal prolapse (89.2 % vs 73.9 %, p < 0.01) with larger size (-32.9 vs -26.4, p < 0.01) and higher grade (p < 0.01) compared to defecation. Conversely, defecation detected eight more cases of rectocele (46.2 % vs 33.9 %, p < 0.01) with larger size (9.2 vs 6.2 cm, p < 0.01) and higher grade (p = 0.26).
CONCLUSION: Post-defecation straining effectively depicts the maximal extent of prolapse in the anterior and middle compartments, and should be performed whenever there is a clinical need for a comprehensive assessment of prolapse in these compartments.