Risk Stratification in Periprosthetic Hip Fracture Surgery: The Risk Analysis Index Is Superior to the Five-Item Modified Frailty Index for Predicting 30-Day Complications.

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic femoral fractures account for up to 16% of all revision total hip arthroplasties with one- and two-year mortality rates of 23.4 and 29.2%, respectively. Given the substantial clinical and financial burden, accurate preoperative risk assessment is essential. This study evaluated the predictive performance of the Five-Item Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) and Risk Analysis Index (RAI) in patients undergoing surgery for PFs, aiming to improve preoperative assessment, inform surgical decision-making, and facilitate postoperative planning.

METHODS

A total of 824 patients at least 18 years old who underwent revision total hip arthroplasty and/or open reduction internal fixation for periprosthetic femoral fractures were identified in a national surgical database. The RAI and mFI-5 were calculated for each patient. Outcomes were major and minor complications, readmission, reoperation, nonhome discharge, wound complications, venous thromboembolisms, and mortalities. Multivariable logistic regression models for each index-outcome were fitted, controlling for body mass index, operative time, procedure type, and smoking status. The ability of RAI and mFI-5 to predict postoperative outcomes was assessed using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) with DeLong's test used to compare differences between correlated AUCs.

RESULTS

The RAI demonstrated significantly better predictive ability for mortality (AUC: 0.69 versus 0.53; P = 0.033) and nonhome discharge (AUC: 0.71 versus 0.57; P < 0.001) compared with mFI-5. In adjusted models, RAI was significantly associated with mortality (odds ratio: 1.08; 95% confidence interval: 1.00 to 1.17; P = 0.040) and nonhome discharge (odds ratio: 1.16; 95% confidence interval: 1.12 to 1.20; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The RAI was superior to the mFI-5 in predicting mortality and nonhome discharge for patients undergoing surgical management of PPFs. Our findings support the implementation of RAI as a tool for preoperative risk stratification and may be impactful in surgical planning and counseling of geriatric orthopaedic patients and their families.