International journal of surgery case reports · 2024
Iatrogenic femoral artery injury due to cerclage wiring for diaphyseal femoral fracture: A case report and review the literature.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Van Nguyen Luong
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: During femoral fracture osteosynthesis, the superficial femoral artery can be incarcerated in the cerclage wiring. We report a case that had an iatrogenic superficial femoral artery injury due to cerclage wiring during femoral osteosynthesis.
CASE PRESENTATION: I reported a 57-year-old patient presented with a fracture at the distal third of the left femur. He had undergone a femoral nailing and a cerclage wiring. Four hours postoperative, his left leg was colder, and his dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial pulse were absent. A CTA revealed his left superficial femoral artery entrapment by cerclage wire. After cerclage removal, the superficial femoral artery and vein had normal flow. The dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial pulse could be palpated. One day following, there was no compromising of blood flow, sensation, or motor-nerve function.
CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Cerclage wiring in the proximal half of the femur was less risk to the femoral artery than in the distal part. The SFA entrapment into a femoral cerclage wire requires an urgent diagnosis and treatment. A missed diagnosis could lead to necrosis of the lower extremity and even death.
CONCLUSION: Our case shows that the superficial femoral artery can be incarcerated in the cerclage wiring during osteosynthesis. Cerclage wiring in the proximal half of the femur was less risk to the femoral artery than in the distal part. We recommend using a suitable cerclage passer precautionary in any femur fracture, particularly in the distal third of the femur.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: A case report.
CASE PRESENTATION: I reported a 57-year-old patient presented with a fracture at the distal third of the left femur. He had undergone a femoral nailing and a cerclage wiring. Four hours postoperative, his left leg was colder, and his dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial pulse were absent. A CTA revealed his left superficial femoral artery entrapment by cerclage wire. After cerclage removal, the superficial femoral artery and vein had normal flow. The dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial pulse could be palpated. One day following, there was no compromising of blood flow, sensation, or motor-nerve function.
CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Cerclage wiring in the proximal half of the femur was less risk to the femoral artery than in the distal part. The SFA entrapment into a femoral cerclage wire requires an urgent diagnosis and treatment. A missed diagnosis could lead to necrosis of the lower extremity and even death.
CONCLUSION: Our case shows that the superficial femoral artery can be incarcerated in the cerclage wiring during osteosynthesis. Cerclage wiring in the proximal half of the femur was less risk to the femoral artery than in the distal part. We recommend using a suitable cerclage passer precautionary in any femur fracture, particularly in the distal third of the femur.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: A case report.