MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10029-025-03361-4

Медицинская библиотека · Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025

Outcomes of open versus robotic preperitoneal ventral hernia repair: a propensity-matched analysis.

Kerr Samantha W, Lorenz William R, Holland Alexis M, Wiley Alynna J, Ayuso Sullivan A, Scarola Gregory T, Kercher Kent W, Heniford B Todd, Augenstein Vedra A

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Minimally invasive abdominal wall reconstruction has become increasingly accepted and performed in our complex population. Despite certain post-operative advantages, including possible decreased length-of-stay and wound complications, robotic ventral hernia repair (RVHR) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes, cost, and operative time following preperitoneal open (OVHR) versus RVHR.

METHODS

Prospectively maintained data from a tertiary hernia center, including 1112 OVHR and 94 RVHR, was reviewed from 2016 to 2023. Patients were matched based on factors known to influence outcomes. A propensity-matched analysis was performed.

RESULTS

91 pairs were well-matched. Match criteria were not significantly different: BMI (30.7(25.3,35.2) vs. 31.4(27.6,34.8) kg/m2;p = 0.566), CDC wound class (85.7% vs. 90.1% clean;p = 0.363), ASA score (47.3% vs. 50.5% ASA-III; 51.6% vs. 46.2% ASA-II;p = 0.535), defect size (24(10,67) vs. 18 (9,40;p = 0.291), diabetes (23.1% vs. 23.1%;p > 0.999), smoking status (35.2% vs. 35.2% former smokers;p > 0.999), and primary vs. recurrent repair (80.1% vs. 80.1% primary; p > 0.999). Both groups had similar number of comorbidities (3(2,5) vs. 3(1,4);p = 0.095), operative time (110(80,182) vs. 106(85,176) minutes;p = 0.686), and wound complications (7.7% vs. 3.3%;p = 0.330). RVHR used smaller mesh (400(225,781) vs. 180(132,320) cm2;p < 0.001) and had shorter length-of-stay (3(2,5) vs. 1(0,2) days;p < 0.001). RVHR had higher operative ($12781(9674,16831) vs. $33756(28535,40468);p < 0.001) and total charges ($51015(35178,66603) vs. $66230(55872,81137);p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference in reoperations (0.0% vs. 1.1%;p > 0.999), recurrence (0.0% vs. 2.2%;p = 0.497), or follow-up (3.1(0.7,25.9) vs. 11.8(2.6,30.8);p = 0.050).

CONCLUSION

Preperitoneal OVHR and RVHR are comparable in terms of wound complications, reoperations, operative time, and hernia recurrence. While RVHR was associated with shorter length-of-stay, it resulted in higher charges.

Для цитирования: Kerr Samantha W, Lorenz William R, Holland Alexis M, Wiley Alynna J, Ayuso Sullivan A, Scarola Gregory T, Kercher Kent W, Heniford B Todd, Augenstein Vedra A. Outcomes of open versus robotic preperitoneal ventral hernia repair: a propensity-matched analysis.. Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-025-03361-4.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.