MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00113-009-1600-7

Медицинская библиотека · Der Unfallchirurg · 2009

[Prophylactic ventilation of severely injured patients with thoracic trauma--does it always make sense?].

Mahlke L, Oestern S, Drost J, Frerichs A, Seekamp A

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

For therapy of blunt thoracic trauma in multiple injured patients, some studies have recommended prophylactic ventilation with kinetic therapy for 3-5 days. In contrast other clinics prefer to reduce the time of ventilation and to extubate as soon as possible. In this retrospective study our patient collective was investigated to find out if early extubation is linked to a higher complication rate. A total of 26 ventilated patients with severe thoracic trauma and an abbreviated injury scale score (AIS thorax) >3 were included in the study. The mean time of ventilation was 98.4 h and in patients without head injury 71.3 h. Out of 22 patients 4 had to be reintubated which had to be repeated for 2 patients. Of the patients 3 developed pneumonia but no cases of adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) were observed. Of the patients 4 died due to other injuries. The mean stay on the intensive care unit was 6.3 days and the mean stay in hospital 22.6 days. Our findings indicate that even with early and aggressive weaning from a respirator with extensive lung contusions an adequate therapy of thorax trauma is possible without having a higher incidence of complications.

Для цитирования: Mahlke L, Oestern S, Drost J, Frerichs A, Seekamp A. [Prophylactic ventilation of severely injured patients with thoracic trauma--does it always make sense?].. Der Unfallchirurg. 2009. DOI: 10.1007/s00113-009-1600-7.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.