DOI 10.1245/s10434-026-20237-8
Left-Sided Uncinate-First Approach as a Technical Adjunct in Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy: Video-Based Technical Insights in Challenging Anatomy.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Uncinate process dissection and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) control represent critical steps in robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD). However, the conventional right-sided uncinate-first approach may be technically demanding in patients with unfavorable anatomy, such as visceral obesity or bulky tumors.
METHODS
This multimedia article presents a video-based demonstration of a left-sided uncinate-first approach in robotic pancreatoduodenectomy. Two illustrative operative scenarios are used to demonstrate technical nuances of SMA exposure and uncinate process dissection in challenging anatomic conditions.
RESULTS
The right-sided approach for a morbidly obese patient demonstrated limited SMA exposure due to increased operative depth and visceral adiposity, requiring substantial traction to identify the correct dissection plane. Conversely, the left-sided approach enabled early vascular control through creation of a mesenteric window, providing direct access to the SMA and facilitating a controlled medial-to-lateral uncinate dissection along a relatively avascular plane. This approach reduced traction on the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) and improved visualization of the posterior dissection plane. In all cases, R0 resection was achieved.
CONCLUSIONS
The left-sided approach represents a feasible technical adjunct in robotic pancreatoduodenectomy. It may enhance SMA exposure and facilitate safer uncinate dissection in selected patients with challenging anatomy, particularly in obesity or bulky tumors. This strategy should be considered within the armamentarium of advanced robotic hepatopancreatobiliary surgery.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.