MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/21645515.2020.1739485

Медицинская библиотека · Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2020

Systematic literature review on the safety and immunogenicity of rotavirus vaccines when co-administered with meningococcal vaccines.

Pereira Priya, Benninghoff Bernd, Moerman Leentje

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This study is aimed to review the published evidence on safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of rotavirus vaccines when co-administered with meningococcal vaccines in infants. A systematic literature search was performed in four databases containing peer-reviewed articles and conference abstracts. In total, twelve articles were included in the review; 11 provided information on safety and five on the immunogenicity of rotavirus vaccines following co-administration. No paper was found on efficacy. Additional routine vaccines were administered in all studies. The safety analysis was mainly focused on fever, vomiting, diarrhea, intussusception, and changes in eating habits. Overall, safety profiles and immune responses associated with rotavirus vaccination were comparable between infants co-administered with rotavirus and meningococcal vaccines and infants receiving rotavirus vaccines without meningococcal vaccines. Although data are limited, co-administration of rotavirus and meningococcal vaccines does not appear to interfere with the safety or immunogenicity of rotavirus vaccines.

Для цитирования: Pereira Priya, Benninghoff Bernd, Moerman Leentje. Systematic literature review on the safety and immunogenicity of rotavirus vaccines when co-administered with meningococcal vaccines.. Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics. 2020. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1739485.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.