MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/md.0000000000003918

Медицинская библиотека · Medicine · 2016

Endoscopic removal of bullets from the cranial ridge junction region via transoral and transnasal approaches: Two case reports and review of literature.

Li Qi, Jiang Zhendong, Zhuo Xianlu, Zhang Xueyuan

Клинический случайСтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Endoscopes in otolaryngology may facilitate accessing the lumens and sites such as upper cervical spine with minimally invasive surgical exposure. Here, we present 2 interesting cases of youth who underwent endoscopic removal of bullets in the cranial ridge junction region.The first case was a 20-year-old young man who underwent a gunshot in the face. A CT scan showed that a metallic foreign body located inside the right lateral body of Atlas that presented a comminuted fracture. The second case a 36-year-old man who also underwent a gunshot in the face. CT scan showed a foreign body lodged in the soft tissues before the right anterior arch of Atlas cone (C1) that presented a fracture. The bullets in these 2 patients were removed under the endoscopes with minimal damage, respectively. The patients were discharged without neck activity obstacle.The advantage of endoscopic technique is obvious because limited visualization does not damage surrounding tissues, thus decreasing surgical complications. This was an interesting experience of surgical operation in this region.

Для цитирования: Li Qi, Jiang Zhendong, Zhuo Xianlu, Zhang Xueyuan. Endoscopic removal of bullets from the cranial ridge junction region via transoral and transnasal approaches: Two case reports and review of literature.. Medicine. 2016. DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000003918.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.