MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s12024-007-9000-1

Медицинская библиотека · Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2007

Pseudo-gunshot wound injury from perforating rib fracture: a cautionary case report.

Paranitharan Paranirubasingam, Parai Jacqueline L, Pollanen Michael S

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We report a case of a young woman who was found unresponsive in a garbage dumpster beneath the balcony of her 9th floor apartment residence. Initial investigations by the police and coroner raised concerns regarding the circumstances of the death. Initial examination of the body, revealed a single penetrating injury on the chest with a wide abrasion collar--the injury pattern was similar to a gunshot entry wound or a shored exit wound. Autopsy revealed the abraded skin perforation along with major chest injuries with bruising of the chest wall, extensive comminuted rib fractures, and pleural and lung lacerations. These injuries were consistent with the effects of a fatal descent from height. The penetrating injury with the abrasion collar was due to a fractured end of a rib protruding through the skin mimicking a gunshot wound. The involvement of a firearm was further excluded by postmortem radiography (no projectile in situ), detailed external examination of the clothing, and scene investigation revealing that the decedent had descended from a balcony into the dumpster. This case underscores the concept that all round penetrating wounds with abrasion collars are not gunshot injuries.

Для цитирования: Paranitharan Paranirubasingam, Parai Jacqueline L, Pollanen Michael S. Pseudo-gunshot wound injury from perforating rib fracture: a cautionary case report.. Forensic science, medicine, and pathology. 2007. DOI: 10.1007/s12024-007-9000-1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.