MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/jom.0000000000002570

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2022

Potential Misinformation in the Official Disability Guidelines About the Diagnosis and Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Gopalkrishnan Sanjiv, Ramachandran Shyam, Ring David, Melhorn J Mark, Crijns Tom J

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Workers' compensation guidelines may reinforce unhelpful thoughts regarding symptoms that are known to increase symptom intensity and magnitude of incapability.

METHODS

One guideline commonly used (the Official Disability Guidelines) was reviewed regarding carpal tunnel syndrome. For 15 statements, we created an alternative statement based on a set of consensus principles for health, value, and quality in care. One hundred eight upper extremity surgeons of the Science of Variation Group reviewed both versions of the statements to indicate their preference.

RESULTS

Surgeons preferred seven revised statements and five guideline statements and were neutral on three statements. Favored revisions related to more accurate discernment of symptoms that are clearly related to idiopathic median neuropathy and representative of severity of pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

There may be important mental health considerations for care under a work claim, such as unhelpful thoughts or distress regarding symptoms, which are not adequately considered by the Official Disability Guidelines.

Для цитирования: Gopalkrishnan Sanjiv, Ramachandran Shyam, Ring David, Melhorn J Mark, Crijns Tom J. Potential Misinformation in the Official Disability Guidelines About the Diagnosis and Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine. 2022. DOI: 10.1097/jom.0000000000002570.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.