Emergency radiology · 2026
Diagnostic yield and clinical predictors of blunt cerebrovascular injury: A CTA utilization review at a level I trauma center.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sasa Pharis B, Rizvi Tasneem Zaihra, Mackey Sandra, Cuttita Nathan, Mahoney Eric
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) is a potentially devastating complication of high-energy trauma that can lead to ischemic stroke if undetected. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is the primary screening modality, though optimal patient selection criteria remain debated. Rising CTA utilization at our institution prompted a quality improvement review to evaluate the diagnostic yield and identify clinical predictors of BCVI.
METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of trauma patients who underwent CTA of the head and neck at a Level I trauma center between January and December 2023.Clinical variables were compared between patients with and without BCVI on univariate analysis, and independent predictors were identified using multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS: Among 305 patients screened, BCVI was identified in 40 patients (13.1%), with a total of 44 injuries due to multivessel involvement in 4 patients. Vertebral artery injuries predominated (34/44,77.3%), with Grade 1 being most common (18/44,40.9%). Loss of consciousness (OR 2.96; 95% CI 1.43-6.29; p = 0.003) and cervical spine fracture (OR 8.06; 95% CI 3.86-17.9; p < 0.001) were independent predictors of BCVI on multivariate analysis. The multivariate model demonstrated good discriminatory performance (AUROC = 0.788; 95% CI 0.707-0.868).
CONCLUSIONS: In a screened trauma cohort, LOC at the scene was a strong independent predictor of BCVI, a relationship not previously incorporated into formal screening criteria. These findings support prospective evaluation of LOC as a clinically accessible adjunct to existing risk-stratification tools.
METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of trauma patients who underwent CTA of the head and neck at a Level I trauma center between January and December 2023.Clinical variables were compared between patients with and without BCVI on univariate analysis, and independent predictors were identified using multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS: Among 305 patients screened, BCVI was identified in 40 patients (13.1%), with a total of 44 injuries due to multivessel involvement in 4 patients. Vertebral artery injuries predominated (34/44,77.3%), with Grade 1 being most common (18/44,40.9%). Loss of consciousness (OR 2.96; 95% CI 1.43-6.29; p = 0.003) and cervical spine fracture (OR 8.06; 95% CI 3.86-17.9; p < 0.001) were independent predictors of BCVI on multivariate analysis. The multivariate model demonstrated good discriminatory performance (AUROC = 0.788; 95% CI 0.707-0.868).
CONCLUSIONS: In a screened trauma cohort, LOC at the scene was a strong independent predictor of BCVI, a relationship not previously incorporated into formal screening criteria. These findings support prospective evaluation of LOC as a clinically accessible adjunct to existing risk-stratification tools.