MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/lgt.0000000000000629

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of lower genital tract disease · 2021

Rectovaginal Fistula in Women With Pessary for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Case Series and Literature Review.

Miranda Varella Pereira Glaucia, Oliveira Brito Luiz Gustavo, Slongo Helena, Carvalho de Araújo Camila, Benedito de Castro Edilson, Teatin Juliato Cássia Raquel

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we present a series of 2 cases of rectovaginal fistula (RVF) due to the use of a ring-type pessary in the conservative treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and a literature review on the management of RVF related to the use of pessaries.

METHODS

Two patients were selected from the medical records of the urogynecology service, and their demographic and clinical data were retrieved. An updated literature review was included presenting cases of RVF induced by or after use of a pessary.

RESULTS

Both patients evolved with removal of the pessary and correction of the fistula. The surgical procedures of choice were Le Fort Colpocleisis and posterior colporraphy without major complications. In the literature review, we selected 17 studies with a total of 23 cases reporting RVFs induced or followed by the use of pessaries.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the pessary is commonly indicated for the conservative treatment of pelvic organ prolapse, this device is not exempt from generating complications.

Для цитирования: Miranda Varella Pereira Glaucia, Oliveira Brito Luiz Gustavo, Slongo Helena, Carvalho de Araújo Camila, Benedito de Castro Edilson, Teatin Juliato Cássia Raquel. Rectovaginal Fistula in Women With Pessary for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Case Series and Literature Review.. Journal of lower genital tract disease. 2021. DOI: 10.1097/lgt.0000000000000629.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.