Foot & ankle international · 2025
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Open FHL Tendon Transfer, Hamstring Transfer, and Turndown Flaps to Treat Chronic Achilles Tendon Ruptures.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Karaismailoglu Bedri, Ghandour Samir, Hendriks Joris, Eftekhari Mani, Eltouny Ehab, Waryasz Gregory, Guss Daniel, Kwon John Y, Ashkani-Esfahani Soheil, Bejarano-Pineda Lorena, DiGiovanni Christopher W
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Chronic Achilles tendon ruptures (CATRs) present significant challenges because of delayed diagnosis and more complicated salvage treatments that can result in unfavorable outcomes and increased rates of adverse events. Various reconstructive surgical options have been described, each with its own unique advantages and disadvantages. Comprehensive comparison of these techniques, however, is lacking. This meta-analysis aimed to compare clinical outcomes following 3 of the most commonly used salvage techniques including flexor hallucis longus (FHL) transfer, hamstring transfer, and gastric-soleal turndown flap.
METHODS: This systematic review adhered to PRISMA guidelines and included studies registered on PROSPERO. Searches were conducted across multiple databases, and eligibility criteria encompassed studies reporting on clinical scores and complications following surgical treatment of CATRs with FHL transfer, hamstring tendon transfer, or turndown flaps. Data extraction, quality assessment, and statistical analyses were performed following standardized protocols.
RESULTS: Among 1910 identified studies, 25 met inclusion criteria with 11 focusing on FHL transfer, 9 on hamstring tendon transfer, and 6 on turndown flap management. A meta-analysis revealed variations in patient demographics, surgical techniques, and rehabilitation protocols across the 3 intervention groups. Although the mean improvement in American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society scores was comparable (38.9 for turndown flap, 31.8 for FHL transfer, and 26.0 for hamstring transfer), complication rates differed significantly. The turndown flap group exhibited the highest overall complication rate, particularly because of wound-related complications, with a wound complication rate of 12.5%, compared with 5.7% for FHL transfer and 3.5% for hamstring transfer.
CONCLUSION: This study underscores the challenge of evidence-based decision making in the surgical management of CATRs. Despite apparently similar functional outcomes, the choice of open surgical technique affects complication rates. Turndown flaps, although effective in restoring musculotendinous continuity, carry higher risks of wound complications compared with the other techniques evaluated.
METHODS: This systematic review adhered to PRISMA guidelines and included studies registered on PROSPERO. Searches were conducted across multiple databases, and eligibility criteria encompassed studies reporting on clinical scores and complications following surgical treatment of CATRs with FHL transfer, hamstring tendon transfer, or turndown flaps. Data extraction, quality assessment, and statistical analyses were performed following standardized protocols.
RESULTS: Among 1910 identified studies, 25 met inclusion criteria with 11 focusing on FHL transfer, 9 on hamstring tendon transfer, and 6 on turndown flap management. A meta-analysis revealed variations in patient demographics, surgical techniques, and rehabilitation protocols across the 3 intervention groups. Although the mean improvement in American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society scores was comparable (38.9 for turndown flap, 31.8 for FHL transfer, and 26.0 for hamstring transfer), complication rates differed significantly. The turndown flap group exhibited the highest overall complication rate, particularly because of wound-related complications, with a wound complication rate of 12.5%, compared with 5.7% for FHL transfer and 3.5% for hamstring transfer.
CONCLUSION: This study underscores the challenge of evidence-based decision making in the surgical management of CATRs. Despite apparently similar functional outcomes, the choice of open surgical technique affects complication rates. Turndown flaps, although effective in restoring musculotendinous continuity, carry higher risks of wound complications compared with the other techniques evaluated.