Clinical radiology · 2015
Bleeding after dilatation and curettage: the efficacy of transcatheter uterine artery embolisation.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Song Y, Shin J H, Yoon H-K, Kim J W, Ko G-Y, Won H-S
Аннотация
AIM: To evaluate safety and clinical outcomes of uterine artery embolisation (UAE) for bleeding after dilatation and curettage (D&C) performed for abortion or termination.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The outcomes were analysed in 11 patients who underwent UAE for bleeding after D&C for missed abortions (n=8), caesarean scar pregnancies (n=2), or planned termination (n=1) between October 2001 and December 2013. Angiograms and medical records were retrospectively reviewed in order to obtain the patients' baseline characteristics, technical/clinical success rate, complications, and follow-up data regarding menstruation.
RESULTS: Technical success, defined as successful catheterisation of both uterine arteries with embolisation to haemostasis, was 100%, whereas clinical success, defined as cessation of bleeding after the initial session of UAE and without the need for additional UAE or surgery for the purpose of haemostasis, was 81.8% (nine of 11). In the two patients with clinical failure due to recurrent vaginal bleeding after UAE, one patient underwent repeat UAE and showed a successful outcome, whilst the other patient required hysterectomy with pathological results of placenta increta. Two other patients underwent hysterectomy for placenta percreta or hydatidiform mole-mimicking remnant placenta. None of the patients included in the present series had procedure-related complications. Menstruation resumed in all eight patients with an intact uterus during the mean follow-up period.
CONCLUSION: UAE may be a safe and effective treatment for bleeding after D&C, especially for women who wish to preserve their fertility; however, hysterectomy may be indicated for patients with a placental abnormality.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The outcomes were analysed in 11 patients who underwent UAE for bleeding after D&C for missed abortions (n=8), caesarean scar pregnancies (n=2), or planned termination (n=1) between October 2001 and December 2013. Angiograms and medical records were retrospectively reviewed in order to obtain the patients' baseline characteristics, technical/clinical success rate, complications, and follow-up data regarding menstruation.
RESULTS: Technical success, defined as successful catheterisation of both uterine arteries with embolisation to haemostasis, was 100%, whereas clinical success, defined as cessation of bleeding after the initial session of UAE and without the need for additional UAE or surgery for the purpose of haemostasis, was 81.8% (nine of 11). In the two patients with clinical failure due to recurrent vaginal bleeding after UAE, one patient underwent repeat UAE and showed a successful outcome, whilst the other patient required hysterectomy with pathological results of placenta increta. Two other patients underwent hysterectomy for placenta percreta or hydatidiform mole-mimicking remnant placenta. None of the patients included in the present series had procedure-related complications. Menstruation resumed in all eight patients with an intact uterus during the mean follow-up period.
CONCLUSION: UAE may be a safe and effective treatment for bleeding after D&C, especially for women who wish to preserve their fertility; however, hysterectomy may be indicated for patients with a placental abnormality.