Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery · 2024
Combined cuff repair and superior capsular reconstruction reinforcement in patients with massive rotator cuff (re)tears: a minimum 2-year clinical and radiological follow-up.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cutbush Kenneth, Hollman Freek, Jomaa Mohammad, Singh Nagmani, Ziegenfuss Brandon, Vijaysegaran Praveen, Italia Kristine, Whitehouse Sarah L, Namazie Ridzwan Mohamed, Gupta Ashish
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Due to the ageing population, the number of symptomatic degenerative rotator cuff tears has increased substantially, and some are challenging to repair due to poor tendon quality with significant retraction. In order to optimize repair integrity and function, rotator cuff repair reinforcement with a superior capsule reconstruction has been proposed. This study presents the results of a technique combining cuff repair and capsular reconstruction (CRACR) using acellular dermal allograft in patients with massive rotator cuff tears and retears.
METHODS: From December 2017 to July 2019, 50 consecutive patients with previous failed rotator cuff repairs or primary surgery on poor tendon quality defined as massive rotator cuff tear (full thickness rotator cuff tears with 2 or more tendons involved), were treated with the CRACR technique and enrolled prospectively. Contraindications for the CRACR procedure were Hamada stage ≥3 cuff tear arthropathy and patient's preference for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Patients were reviewed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, Constant Murley Scores, Visual Analogue Scores, Oxford Shoulder Score, QuickDASH). Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans were requested at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperatively, to assess repair integrity.
RESULTS: Mean age at surgery was 58.0 years (SD 8.1, range 41-79). Of the 50 patients, 14 patients (28.0%) had previous failed rotator cuff repair. From the 36 primary cases, 28 (77.8%) had massive rotator cuff tears and one (2.8%) a perioperative irreparable tear, while 28 (77.8%) patients had a subscapularis tear. At 2 years of follow-up all scores improved significantly (Visual Analogue Scores 6.3 to 1.5; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons 34.0 to 79.0; Constant Murley Scores 30.9 to 68.0; OSS 23.3 to 40.1; QuickDASH 56.2 to 20.3; all P < .001). Magnetic resonance imaging scans were conducted at a mean of 14.4 months (SD 7.0, range 3-26) after surgery showing 6 isolated superior capsular reconstruction failures and 5 isolated rotator cuff retears.
CONCLUSION: In the short term, the CRACR technique is a valid option for patients with massive rotator cuff tears and retears with a high chance of a postoperative retear due to poor tendon quality. Clinical results and repair integrity are promising. Longer term follow-up is ongoing to establish the efficacy of this procedure.
METHODS: From December 2017 to July 2019, 50 consecutive patients with previous failed rotator cuff repairs or primary surgery on poor tendon quality defined as massive rotator cuff tear (full thickness rotator cuff tears with 2 or more tendons involved), were treated with the CRACR technique and enrolled prospectively. Contraindications for the CRACR procedure were Hamada stage ≥3 cuff tear arthropathy and patient's preference for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Patients were reviewed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, Constant Murley Scores, Visual Analogue Scores, Oxford Shoulder Score, QuickDASH). Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans were requested at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperatively, to assess repair integrity.
RESULTS: Mean age at surgery was 58.0 years (SD 8.1, range 41-79). Of the 50 patients, 14 patients (28.0%) had previous failed rotator cuff repair. From the 36 primary cases, 28 (77.8%) had massive rotator cuff tears and one (2.8%) a perioperative irreparable tear, while 28 (77.8%) patients had a subscapularis tear. At 2 years of follow-up all scores improved significantly (Visual Analogue Scores 6.3 to 1.5; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons 34.0 to 79.0; Constant Murley Scores 30.9 to 68.0; OSS 23.3 to 40.1; QuickDASH 56.2 to 20.3; all P < .001). Magnetic resonance imaging scans were conducted at a mean of 14.4 months (SD 7.0, range 3-26) after surgery showing 6 isolated superior capsular reconstruction failures and 5 isolated rotator cuff retears.
CONCLUSION: In the short term, the CRACR technique is a valid option for patients with massive rotator cuff tears and retears with a high chance of a postoperative retear due to poor tendon quality. Clinical results and repair integrity are promising. Longer term follow-up is ongoing to establish the efficacy of this procedure.