DOI 10.1007/s00404-020-05804-y
Severe cervical inflammation and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: a cross-sectional study.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Inflammation has been reported as a facilitator in cervical oncogenesis, but the correlation between inflammation and cytological abnormality remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between inflammation and cytological abnormality.
METHODS
ThinPrep cytological test (TCT) was used to detect cervical cytological abnormalities and inflammation degrees of 46,255 women in this prospective cross-sectional study. Histopathological examination was used to define the cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in patients with cervical cytological abnormalities.
RESULTS
The study revealed that 8.87% (4102/46,255) of TCT results had cytological abnormalities. The 4102 included cases were classified as the case group, including atypical squamous cells (ASC), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL). Women with negative intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (NILM) were classified as the control group. About 88.83% (3644/4102) of women with cytological abnormalities showed inflammations. The rate of severe inflammation was significantly higher in the case group than the control group (23.86% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.000). Our results also showed that patients with severe inflammation had a significantly increasing incidence of cytological abnormality by 12.598 times and elevated the risk of HSIL by 756.47 times, compared to the inflammation negative group.
CONCLUSION
Severe inflammation was positively related to HSIL. Patients with severe cervical inflammation should be given more follow-ups and regular examinations and treated more carefully than those with mild or no inflammation.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.