The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2025
Ultrasound-indicated and physical examination-indicated cervical cerclage in twin versus singleton gestations.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Amitai Komem Daphna, Meyer Raanan, Yagel Itai, Shai Daniel, Mashiach Roy, Hendler Israel, Mazaki-Tovi Shali, Yinon Yoav
Аннотация
AIM: To compare the safety and efficacy of ultrasound- and physical examination-indicated cervical cerclage in twin versus singleton gestations.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all ultrasound-indicated (cervical length ≤ 25 mm) and physical examination-indicated cerclage cases performed over a 9-year period. The primary outcome was the time interval from cerclage placement to delivery.
RESULTS: The study cohort included 94 singleton and 16 twin pregnancies. The time interval from cerclage placement to delivery was comparable in singleton and twin gestations (14.77 vs. 12.07 weeks, p = 0.11), as were the rates of preterm births before 28 and 32 weeks. The rate of alive newborns >24 weeks was lower in the twin group (71.9% vs. 88.3%, p = 0.028). Regression analysis identified that cervical dilation, but not twin gestation, was the only factor independently associated with an increased risk for birth before 32 weeks.
CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-indicated and physical examination-indicated cerclage had comparable efficacy in prolonging pregnancy in twin and singleton gestations, though live birth rates were lower in twins.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all ultrasound-indicated (cervical length ≤ 25 mm) and physical examination-indicated cerclage cases performed over a 9-year period. The primary outcome was the time interval from cerclage placement to delivery.
RESULTS: The study cohort included 94 singleton and 16 twin pregnancies. The time interval from cerclage placement to delivery was comparable in singleton and twin gestations (14.77 vs. 12.07 weeks, p = 0.11), as were the rates of preterm births before 28 and 32 weeks. The rate of alive newborns >24 weeks was lower in the twin group (71.9% vs. 88.3%, p = 0.028). Regression analysis identified that cervical dilation, but not twin gestation, was the only factor independently associated with an increased risk for birth before 32 weeks.
CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-indicated and physical examination-indicated cerclage had comparable efficacy in prolonging pregnancy in twin and singleton gestations, though live birth rates were lower in twins.