Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2024
Maternal vascular indices at 36 weeks' gestation in pregnancy with small or growth-restricted fetus.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Szczepkowska A, Adjahou S, Papastefanou I, De Pauli M, Nicolaides K H, Charakida M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal vascular indices and hemodynamic parameters at 35-37 weeks' gestation in pregnancies complicated by delivery of a small-for-gestational-age (SGA) or growth-restricted (FGR) neonate.
METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of women with a singleton pregnancy attending for a routine hospital visit at 35 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation. The visit included recording of maternal demographic characteristics, medical history, vascular indices and hemodynamic parameters, which were obtained using a non-invasive operator-independent device and included pulse-wave velocity, augmentation index, cardiac output, stroke volume, central systolic and diastolic blood pressure, total peripheral resistance and heart rate. Women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were excluded. SGA was diagnosed if birth weight was < 10th percentile. FGR was diagnosed if, in addition to birth weight < 10th percentile, at the 35-37-week scan, uterine artery or umbilical artery pulsatility index (PI) was > 95th percentile or fetal middle cerebral artery PI was < 5th percentile.
RESULTS: Among the 6413 women included in the study, there were 605 (9.4%) cases of SGA, 133 (2.1%) cases of FGR and 5675 (88.5%) cases that were unaffected by SGA or FGR. Women with SGA or FGR, compared to unaffected pregnancies, had increased peripheral vascular resistance and reduced cardiac output. Central systolic and diastolic blood pressure were increased in the FGR group compared with the unaffected group. Aortic stiffness, as assessed by pulse-wave velocity, and augmentation index did not differ between affected and unaffected pregnancies. In the FGR group, compared with the SGA group, central systolic and diastolic blood pressure were higher, whereas heart rate was lower.
CONCLUSIONS: SGA and FGR pregnancies exhibit deranged maternal hemodynamic responses compared with unaffected pregnancies. Pregnancies with FGR have higher central blood pressure compared to those with SGA, but it remains unclear whether these differences are driven by the size of the fetus or pathological fetal growth. © 2024 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of women with a singleton pregnancy attending for a routine hospital visit at 35 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation. The visit included recording of maternal demographic characteristics, medical history, vascular indices and hemodynamic parameters, which were obtained using a non-invasive operator-independent device and included pulse-wave velocity, augmentation index, cardiac output, stroke volume, central systolic and diastolic blood pressure, total peripheral resistance and heart rate. Women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were excluded. SGA was diagnosed if birth weight was < 10th percentile. FGR was diagnosed if, in addition to birth weight < 10th percentile, at the 35-37-week scan, uterine artery or umbilical artery pulsatility index (PI) was > 95th percentile or fetal middle cerebral artery PI was < 5th percentile.
RESULTS: Among the 6413 women included in the study, there were 605 (9.4%) cases of SGA, 133 (2.1%) cases of FGR and 5675 (88.5%) cases that were unaffected by SGA or FGR. Women with SGA or FGR, compared to unaffected pregnancies, had increased peripheral vascular resistance and reduced cardiac output. Central systolic and diastolic blood pressure were increased in the FGR group compared with the unaffected group. Aortic stiffness, as assessed by pulse-wave velocity, and augmentation index did not differ between affected and unaffected pregnancies. In the FGR group, compared with the SGA group, central systolic and diastolic blood pressure were higher, whereas heart rate was lower.
CONCLUSIONS: SGA and FGR pregnancies exhibit deranged maternal hemodynamic responses compared with unaffected pregnancies. Pregnancies with FGR have higher central blood pressure compared to those with SGA, but it remains unclear whether these differences are driven by the size of the fetus or pathological fetal growth. © 2024 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
HumansFemalePregnancyProspective StudiesFetal Growth RetardationInfant, Small for Gestational AgeAdultInfant, NewbornPregnancy Trimester, ThirdUltrasonography, PrenatalHemodynamicsUterine ArteryGestational AgeBlood PressureUmbilical ArteriesPulsatile FlowBirth WeightVascular ResistancePulse Wave AnalysisCardiac Output