MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/nau.20852

Медицинская библиотека · Neurourology and urodynamics · 2010

Neurologic urinary incontinence.

Wyndaele J J, Kovindha A, Madersbacher H, Radziszewski P, Ruffion A, Schurch B, Castro D, Igawa Y, Sakakibara R, Wein A, Committe 10 on Neurogenic Bladder and Bowel of the International Consultation on Incontinence 2008-2009

СтатьяКлинические рекомендацииОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

This manuscript summarizes the work of Committee 10 on neurologic bladder and bowel of the International Consultation on Incontinence in 2008-2009. As the data are very large the outcome is presented in different manuscripts. This manuscript deals with neurologic urinary incontinence.

METHODS

Through in debt literature review all aspects of neurological urinary incontinence were studied for levels of evidence. Recommendations for diagnosis and treatment, and for future research were made.

RESULTS

Pathophysiology was summarized for different levels of lesions. For epidemiology, specific diagnostics, conservative treatment and surgical treatment of neurologic urinary incontinence, levels of evidence and grades of recommendation were made following ICUD criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Though data are available that advice and guide in the management of urinary incontinence in neurologic patients, not many data have a high level of evidence or permit a high grade of recommendation. More and well-structured research is needed.

Для цитирования: Wyndaele J J, Kovindha A, Madersbacher H, Radziszewski P, Ruffion A, Schurch B, Castro D, Igawa Y, Sakakibara R, Wein A, Committe 10 on Neurogenic Bladder and Bowel of the International Consultation on Incontinence 2008-2009. Neurologic urinary incontinence.. Neurourology and urodynamics. 2010. DOI: 10.1002/nau.20852.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.