MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s11255-017-1652-5

Медицинская библиотека · International urology and nephrology · 2017

Use of biological mesh in trans-anal treatment for recurrent recto-urethral fistula.

Moretto G, Casaril A, Inama M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To report the author's experience on a mini-invasive technique using bioprosthetic plug and a rectal wall flap advancement in the treatment of recurrent recto-urethral fistula.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Between 2013 and 2015, seven patients with recurrent recto-urethral fistula were referred to the Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy. Intraoperatively all patients were found to have a rectal wall lesion and were treated with urinary and fecal diversion. For the persistence of the fistula, all the patients underwent a mini-invasive treatment consisting on placement of a bioprosthetic plug in the fistula covered by an endorectal advancement flap through a trans-anal and trans-urethral combined technique.

RESULTS

Median operative time was 48 min with a median blood loss of 30 ml. Median hospital stay was 3 days (IQR 1-3). No case of fistula recurrence or plug migration was described. None of the patients experienced fecal or urinary incontinence. All patients obtained complete fistula healing.

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrent recto-urethral fistula is a challenging postsurgical complication for surgeons and urologists, and its best treatment is still unknown. Our method seems to be feasible and effective for the treatment of complex recto-urethral fistula.

Для цитирования: Moretto G, Casaril A, Inama M. Use of biological mesh in trans-anal treatment for recurrent recto-urethral fistula.. International urology and nephrology. 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-017-1652-5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.