MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/dcr.0000000000001206

Медицинская библиотека · Diseases of the colon and rectum · 2018

Early Urinary Catheter Removal Following Pelvic Colorectal Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Noninferiority Trial.

Patel Devin N, Felder Seth I, Luu Michael, Daskivich Timothy J, N Zaghiyan Karen, Fleshner Phillip

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеEquivalence TrialПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Because of the potential increased incidence of acute urinary retention, optimal timing of urinary catheter removal after major pelvic colorectal surgery remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to compare the incidence of urinary retention following early catheter removal on postoperative day 1 vs standard catheter removal on day 3.

DESIGN

This is a randomized, noninferiority trial.

SETTING

This study was conducted at an urban teaching hospital.

PATIENTS: Patients undergoing colorectal surgery below the peritoneal reflection were selected.

INTERVENTIONS: A 1:1 randomization to early or standard catheter removal was performed. Patients in the early arm were administered an α-antagonist (prazosin 1 mg oral) 6 hours before catheter removal.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measured was the incidence of acute urinary retention.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-two patients were randomly assigned to early (n = 71) or standard (n = 71) catheter removal. Mean age was 44.8 ± 16.9 years, and the study cohort included 54% men. The most common operations were IPAA (66%) and low anterior resection (18%). The overall rate of retention was 9.2% (n = 13), with no difference between early (n = 6; 8.5%) or standard (n = 7; 9.9%) catheter removal (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.30-2.42). The risk difference was -1.4% (95% CI, -8.3 to 11.1), confirming noninferiority. The rate of infection was significantly lower in early vs standard catheter removal (0% vs 11.3%; p = 0.01). Length of stay was significantly shorter after early vs standard catheter removal (4 days, interquartile range = 3-6 vs 5 days, interquartile range = 4-7; p = 0.03).

LIMITATIONS: Patients and investigators were not blinded; a nonselective oral α-antagonist was used.

CONCLUSIONS

Following pelvic colorectal surgery, early urinary catheter removal, when combined with the addition of an oral α-antagonist, is noninferior to standard urinary catheter removal and carries a lower risk of symptomatic infection and shorter hospital stay.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01923129). See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A738.

Для цитирования: Patel Devin N, Felder Seth I, Luu Michael, Daskivich Timothy J, N Zaghiyan Karen, Fleshner Phillip. Early Urinary Catheter Removal Following Pelvic Colorectal Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Noninferiority Trial.. Diseases of the colon and rectum. 2018. DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000001206.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.