Clinical and translational science · 2026
Impact of CYP2D6 Metabolizer Status on Ondansetron Efficacy in Early Pregnancy Induced Nausea and Vomiting: A Case Control Study.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liu Michelle, Shuey Megan M, Holley Sabrina E, Fountain Darlene F, Jaworski James, Griffin Carol, Kim Jeewoo, Stec Melissa, Sunthankar Sudeep D, Ong Henry H, Gangireddy Srushti, Wei Wei-Qi, Gaedigk Andrea, Velez Edwards Digna R, Kawai Vivian K
Аннотация
Real-world data investigating CYP2D6 on the efficacy of ondansetron for nausea and vomiting in pregnancy (NVP) is lacking. Evidence shows CYP2D6 ultrarapid metabolizers are at risk of ondansetron nonresponse due to increased metabolism. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of early pregnant patients on ondansetron for NVP. Genotype data for 11 CYP2D6 variants and copy number variations were translated into activity score (AS) and metabolizer status: poor (PM), intermediate (IM), normal (NM), and ultrarapid (UM) metabolizers. A total of 264 women met inclusion/exclusion criteria (99 cases and 165 controls). Multivariate regression analyses of metabolizer status and AS were adjusted for significant independent variables. The majority had gravidity of two, singleton pregnancy, a median age of 28 (interquartile range [IQR] 24-31) years, and identified as White (65.5%). Ondansetron dose was similar among the cohort and half received other antiemetics simultaneously. Clinical characteristics between cases and controls did not differ except for gestational age (8 vs. 10 weeks, p = 0.004) and primigravida rate (45.5% vs. 32.7%, p = 0.017). When adjusted for covariates, metabolizer status was not associated with response. UM/NM had non-significantly higher risk of nonresponse (odds ratio [OR] 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-2.66) compared to PM/IM. Similar trends were observed with higher CYP2D6 AS showing increased risk of nonresponse (OR 1.22, 95% CI [0.81-1.85]). This study found no significant differences in ondansetron response in early pregnancy based on CYP2D6 UM/NM versus PM/IM and AS. Additional prospective investigations are necessary to confirm the CYP2D6 effect on ondansetron efficacy in pregnant patients.