MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/1753193416669317

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of hand surgery, European volume · 2016

Metacarpal lengthening in children: comparison of three different techniques in 15 consecutive cases.

Dana C, Aurégan J-C, Salon A, Guéro S, Glorion C, Pannier S

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: Metacarpal lengthening is a useful procedure to address hand deficiencies in children. In this study, we aimed to compare the results of three different techniques from one consecutive clinical series of hand deficiencies. A total of 15 metacarpal lengthenings have been performed in 12 children aged from 9 to 14 years. The callotasis technique was used in seven cases, the two-stage distraction-graft technique in four cases and the single-stage lengthening in four cases. All the metacarpals healed with bone. The lengthening obtained was a mean of 13 mm (range 8-21 mm), a mean of 22 mm (range 13-32 mm) and a mean of 12 mm (range 9-15 mm), respectively, in the three different techniques. The healing index was longer for callotasis (81 days/cm) compared with the other techniques (41 days/cm and 46 days/cm, respectively). We observed one case of fracture after callotasis and one after distraction-graft. One patient underwent tenolysis of the extensor mechanism after single-stage lengthening. In conclusion, distraction graft and single-stage lengthening may be valuable alternatives to callotasis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; therapeutic study; multi-case series.

Для цитирования: Dana C, Aurégan J-C, Salon A, Guéro S, Glorion C, Pannier S. Metacarpal lengthening in children: comparison of three different techniques in 15 consecutive cases.. The Journal of hand surgery, European volume. 2016. DOI: 10.1177/1753193416669317.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.