BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024
Uncertain significance and molecular insights of CPLANE1 variants in prenatal diagnosis of Joubert syndrome: a case report.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Si-Xiu, Chen Leiting, Deng Chen, Tang Dongmei, Zhang Jing, Hu Wen-Guang, Hu Yu, Lai Hua, Yang Xiao
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Prenatal whole exome sequencing (WES) is becoming an increasingly used diagnostic tool for fetuses with structural anomalies. However, the identification of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in clinically relevant genes can significantly complicate prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling.
CASE PRESENTATION: A fetus conceived through in vitro fertilization at the third attempt presented with polydactyly and molar tooth sign at 24 + 6 weeks of gestation. Trio-based WES was performed on both parents and the affected fetus, revealing a pair of compound heterozygous CPLANE1 variants (c.4646 A > T/p.Glu1549Val and c.1233 C > A/p.Tyr411*) potentially associated with Joubert syndrome. According to the ACMG guidelines, one of the biallelic variants was classified as VUS, and the other as pathogenic. However, these variants had no allele frequencies in the general population. The p.Tyr411* variant was classified as deleterious, while the p.Glu1549Val variant was located in highly conserved residues, was predicted to be damaging by in silico tools, and altered hydrogen bonding. Furthermore, CPLANE1 expression was highest in the brain during the embryonic and fetal stages. These findings provide additional support for the association between CPLANE1 variants in this fetus and Joubert syndrome. Thus, the most likely diagnosis was Joubert syndrome, and after careful consideration, the couple decided to terminate the pregnancy.
CONCLUSION: The expression patterns of CPLANE1 and the molecular effects of the variants may provide further evidence supporting the potential for prenatal diagnosis of Joubert syndrome in the case of biallelic VUS and pathogenic variant. This study suggests that molecular insights may play a role in interpreting VUS in clinically relevant prenatal genes for prenatal diagnosis.
CASE PRESENTATION: A fetus conceived through in vitro fertilization at the third attempt presented with polydactyly and molar tooth sign at 24 + 6 weeks of gestation. Trio-based WES was performed on both parents and the affected fetus, revealing a pair of compound heterozygous CPLANE1 variants (c.4646 A > T/p.Glu1549Val and c.1233 C > A/p.Tyr411*) potentially associated with Joubert syndrome. According to the ACMG guidelines, one of the biallelic variants was classified as VUS, and the other as pathogenic. However, these variants had no allele frequencies in the general population. The p.Tyr411* variant was classified as deleterious, while the p.Glu1549Val variant was located in highly conserved residues, was predicted to be damaging by in silico tools, and altered hydrogen bonding. Furthermore, CPLANE1 expression was highest in the brain during the embryonic and fetal stages. These findings provide additional support for the association between CPLANE1 variants in this fetus and Joubert syndrome. Thus, the most likely diagnosis was Joubert syndrome, and after careful consideration, the couple decided to terminate the pregnancy.
CONCLUSION: The expression patterns of CPLANE1 and the molecular effects of the variants may provide further evidence supporting the potential for prenatal diagnosis of Joubert syndrome in the case of biallelic VUS and pathogenic variant. This study suggests that molecular insights may play a role in interpreting VUS in clinically relevant prenatal genes for prenatal diagnosis.