Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine · 2025
Effect of high positive end-expiratory pressure on perioperative atelectasis in neonates and small infants (0-6 months) with healthy lungs: A randomized controlled trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yao Jiaxin, Gao Qiushi, Sun Nan, Ji Haiyin, Cui Meiying, Zhao Ping
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: High positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is commonly used to improve pulmonary ventilation in infants with injured lungs. However, its intraoperative application in infants with healthy lungs remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of high PEEP on perioperative pulmonary outcomes (PPCs) in this population.
METHODS: Neonates and small infants aged 0-6 months undergoing surgery were randomly assigned to receive mechanical ventilation with a conventional PEEP of 5 cmH2O or a high PEEP of 8 cmH2O. Lung ultrasound (LUS) score was measured at four time points: T1, after intubation; T2, at the end of surgery; T3, 30 min after extubation; and T4, 24 h postoperatively. The primary outcome was the LUS score at four time points. The secondary outcome was the incidence of PPCs within the first 7 postoperative days.
RESULTS: A total of 1056 ultrasonographic images were obtained from 44 subjects. During surgery, the driving pressure at PEEP 5 cmH2O was significantly higher than PEEP 8 cmH2O (12.4 [1.7] vs. 10.8 [1.9] cmH2O; p = 0.010). At the end of surgery, the total LUS score was significantly higher in the PEEP 5 cm H2O group compared to the PEEP 8 cmH2O group (14.5 [5.1] vs. 11.4 [4.4]; p = 0.039). However, no significant difference between groups was observed at T3 or T4. The incidence of PPCs during the first 7 postoperative days remained low in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Although high PEEP is more effective than conventional PEEP in reducing intraoperative atelectasis, it does not appear to provide any postoperative benefits. The advantages of intraoperative high PEEP may not extend beyond the duration of surgery in neonates and infants with healthy lungs.
REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Register (ChiCTR2300069230), date of registration: March 10, 2023.
METHODS: Neonates and small infants aged 0-6 months undergoing surgery were randomly assigned to receive mechanical ventilation with a conventional PEEP of 5 cmH2O or a high PEEP of 8 cmH2O. Lung ultrasound (LUS) score was measured at four time points: T1, after intubation; T2, at the end of surgery; T3, 30 min after extubation; and T4, 24 h postoperatively. The primary outcome was the LUS score at four time points. The secondary outcome was the incidence of PPCs within the first 7 postoperative days.
RESULTS: A total of 1056 ultrasonographic images were obtained from 44 subjects. During surgery, the driving pressure at PEEP 5 cmH2O was significantly higher than PEEP 8 cmH2O (12.4 [1.7] vs. 10.8 [1.9] cmH2O; p = 0.010). At the end of surgery, the total LUS score was significantly higher in the PEEP 5 cm H2O group compared to the PEEP 8 cmH2O group (14.5 [5.1] vs. 11.4 [4.4]; p = 0.039). However, no significant difference between groups was observed at T3 or T4. The incidence of PPCs during the first 7 postoperative days remained low in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Although high PEEP is more effective than conventional PEEP in reducing intraoperative atelectasis, it does not appear to provide any postoperative benefits. The advantages of intraoperative high PEEP may not extend beyond the duration of surgery in neonates and infants with healthy lungs.
REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Register (ChiCTR2300069230), date of registration: March 10, 2023.