Journal of science and medicine in sport · 2018
Primarily hip-borne load carriage does not alter biomechanical risk factors for overuse injuries in soldiers.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lenton Gavin K, Saxby David J, Lloyd David G, Billing Daniel, Higgs Jeremy, Doyle Tim L A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of different body armour types, carried loads, and walking speeds on trunk and lower-limb joint biomechanics.
DESIGN: Within-subjects repeated measures to determine the effects of different body armour types, carried loads, and walking speeds on trunk and lower-limb joint biomechanics.
METHODS: Twenty soldiers (29.5±7.1yrs) completed a treadmill walking protocol in an unloaded (baseline) condition and wearing a control, Tiered Body Armour System (TBAS) and five different armour types (cARM1-2, pARM1) with two load configurations (15 and 30kg) for a total of eight armour×load ensembles. In each ensemble, participants walked for 10min at 1.53ms-1 and 1.81ms-1 speeds. Whole-body marker kinematics and ground reaction forces were used, along with a scaled anatomic model, to determine peak lower-limb joint angles, net joint moments, and negative knee work. Peak parameters were compared between armour types, walking speeds, and carried loads using repeated measures ANOVAs.
RESULTS: Peak plantarflexion and hip abduction moments were reduced when wearing cARM1 (p=0.040, p=0.045) and cARM2 (p=0.045, p=0.003) compared to TBAS, while carrying 30kg and/or walking fast. This suggests positive benefits of load distribution at higher task demands. Joint moments increased when participants carried greater load and/or walked faster, and the combined effects of carried load and walking speed were mostly additive.
CONCLUSIONS: Primarily hip-borne load carriage does not negatively alter joint kinetics, and some positive adaptations occurred during tasks with higher demands. These results can inform equipment design and physical training programs for load carriage.
DESIGN: Within-subjects repeated measures to determine the effects of different body armour types, carried loads, and walking speeds on trunk and lower-limb joint biomechanics.
METHODS: Twenty soldiers (29.5±7.1yrs) completed a treadmill walking protocol in an unloaded (baseline) condition and wearing a control, Tiered Body Armour System (TBAS) and five different armour types (cARM1-2, pARM1) with two load configurations (15 and 30kg) for a total of eight armour×load ensembles. In each ensemble, participants walked for 10min at 1.53ms-1 and 1.81ms-1 speeds. Whole-body marker kinematics and ground reaction forces were used, along with a scaled anatomic model, to determine peak lower-limb joint angles, net joint moments, and negative knee work. Peak parameters were compared between armour types, walking speeds, and carried loads using repeated measures ANOVAs.
RESULTS: Peak plantarflexion and hip abduction moments were reduced when wearing cARM1 (p=0.040, p=0.045) and cARM2 (p=0.045, p=0.003) compared to TBAS, while carrying 30kg and/or walking fast. This suggests positive benefits of load distribution at higher task demands. Joint moments increased when participants carried greater load and/or walked faster, and the combined effects of carried load and walking speed were mostly additive.
CONCLUSIONS: Primarily hip-borne load carriage does not negatively alter joint kinetics, and some positive adaptations occurred during tasks with higher demands. These results can inform equipment design and physical training programs for load carriage.