MedElevator
Войти в исследования Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy · 2026
Transvaginal versus transabdominal extraction techniques in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Galli Liliana, Luka Laura, Franchi Massimo Piergiuseppe, Zorzato Pier Carlo, Festi Anna, Ricci Alberta, Magni Francesca, Laganá Antonio Simone, Bosco Mariachiara, Uccella Stefano, Garzon Simone
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In laparoscopic surgery, specimen retrieval can require enlarging abdominal incisions, reducing the minimally invasive benefits. Transvaginal specimen extraction (TVSE) can offer a safer, more cosmetic alternative for women. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the safety and outcomes of TVSE compared with transabdominal extraction, regardless of surgical indication.
METHODS: EMBASE, Scopus, PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to April 2025. Studies were grouped by design, surgical specialty, and extraction method (port enlargement versus mini-laparotomy) to explore heterogeneity.
RESULTS: Twenty-five studies were included for 2751 patients (1144 TVSE, 1607 transabdominal extraction) in general, urologic, or gynecologic surgery. TVSE was associated with lower postoperative pain (mean difference -0.98, 95%CI -1.30 to -0.66), rescue analgesia use (OR 0.38, 95%CI 0.28 to 0.51), postoperative complications (OR 0.55, 95%CI 0.34 to 0.89), shorter hospital stays (mean difference -1.04, 95%CI -1.77 to -0.30), and higher cosmetic satisfaction (mean difference 0.91, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.35), especially versus mini-laparotomy. Blood loss, intraoperative complications, and dyspareunia did not differ.
CONCLUSION: TVSE is associated with improved postoperative outcomes when it replaces mini-laparotomy, whereas less benefit is observed versus laparoscopic port-site enlargement. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.
METHODS: EMBASE, Scopus, PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to April 2025. Studies were grouped by design, surgical specialty, and extraction method (port enlargement versus mini-laparotomy) to explore heterogeneity.
RESULTS: Twenty-five studies were included for 2751 patients (1144 TVSE, 1607 transabdominal extraction) in general, urologic, or gynecologic surgery. TVSE was associated with lower postoperative pain (mean difference -0.98, 95%CI -1.30 to -0.66), rescue analgesia use (OR 0.38, 95%CI 0.28 to 0.51), postoperative complications (OR 0.55, 95%CI 0.34 to 0.89), shorter hospital stays (mean difference -1.04, 95%CI -1.77 to -0.30), and higher cosmetic satisfaction (mean difference 0.91, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.35), especially versus mini-laparotomy. Blood loss, intraoperative complications, and dyspareunia did not differ.
CONCLUSION: TVSE is associated with improved postoperative outcomes when it replaces mini-laparotomy, whereas less benefit is observed versus laparoscopic port-site enlargement. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.