Obstetrics and gynecology · 2025
Mode of Delivery and Subsequent Motor Function in Children With Myelomeningocele Without In Utero Repair.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Palatnik Anna, Pan Amy Y, Emery Stephen P, Greene Stephanie, Muthiah Nallammai, Berman Deborah, Buchmiller Terry L, Gebb Juliana, Lillegard Joseph, Miller Jena L, Newton J, Schneider Patrick, Blumenfeld Yair J, Powne Amy B, Cibulskis Catherine C, Drennan Kathryn, Papanna Ramesha, NAFTNet (North American Fetal Therapy Network)
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between mode of delivery and 2-year motor function in children with prenatal diagnosis of myelomeningocele.
METHODS: A multisite retrospective cohort study of children with myelomeningocele across 14 NAFTNet (North American Fetal Therapy Network) centers born between 2007 and 2020 who had a physical examination available at 2 years of life. Exclusion criteria were in utero myelomeningocele repair, postnatal myelomeningocele diagnosis, missing data on fetal presentation at delivery, and contraindications to labor. The primary outcome was the difference between the anatomic level of the spinal lesion and functional motor level at age 2 years. A general linear model was used to determine the effect of mode of delivery on the primary outcome, and multivariable analysis was performed to control for presence of labor, gestational age at delivery, defect size and origin level, and presence of ventriculomegaly.
RESULTS: Of 566 children with myelomeningocele, 305 met inclusion criteria, with 216 (70.8%) having been delivered by cesarean and 89 (29.2%) having been delivered vaginally. Children delivered by cesarean had a mean±SE level of motor function of 0.07±0.21 segments below the anatomic level at age 2 years compared with 0.57±0.32 for children delivered vaginally ( P =.19). After controlling for potential confounders, both groups improved in motor function by age 2 years compared with anatomic level. However, there was no difference in motor improvement between groups by mode of delivery (0.07 cesarean vs 0.57 vaginal delivery, adjusted difference 0.37 segments, P =.63).
CONCLUSION: In this multisite NAFTNet cohort, mode of delivery was not associated with lower-extremity motor function at age 2 years.
METHODS: A multisite retrospective cohort study of children with myelomeningocele across 14 NAFTNet (North American Fetal Therapy Network) centers born between 2007 and 2020 who had a physical examination available at 2 years of life. Exclusion criteria were in utero myelomeningocele repair, postnatal myelomeningocele diagnosis, missing data on fetal presentation at delivery, and contraindications to labor. The primary outcome was the difference between the anatomic level of the spinal lesion and functional motor level at age 2 years. A general linear model was used to determine the effect of mode of delivery on the primary outcome, and multivariable analysis was performed to control for presence of labor, gestational age at delivery, defect size and origin level, and presence of ventriculomegaly.
RESULTS: Of 566 children with myelomeningocele, 305 met inclusion criteria, with 216 (70.8%) having been delivered by cesarean and 89 (29.2%) having been delivered vaginally. Children delivered by cesarean had a mean±SE level of motor function of 0.07±0.21 segments below the anatomic level at age 2 years compared with 0.57±0.32 for children delivered vaginally ( P =.19). After controlling for potential confounders, both groups improved in motor function by age 2 years compared with anatomic level. However, there was no difference in motor improvement between groups by mode of delivery (0.07 cesarean vs 0.57 vaginal delivery, adjusted difference 0.37 segments, P =.63).
CONCLUSION: In this multisite NAFTNet cohort, mode of delivery was not associated with lower-extremity motor function at age 2 years.