THE CLINICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE CERVICAL PERFORATED PESSARY FOR THE PREVENTION OF PRETERM LABOR IN WOMEN WITH PRIOR PRETERM BIRTHS.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
The aim: The assessment of clinical effectiveness the cervical perforated pessary (CPP) used for prevention of preterm labor.
PATIENTS AND
METHODS
Materials and methods: Caucasian women with prior SPL who were randomized to receive a CPP (clinical group) or without pessary (control group) was conducted at the Vinnytsya maternal hospital №1, from 2014 through 2018. Eligible women were those referred to the institution for a diagnosis of cervical incompetence between 16 weeks and 18 weeks +6 days. Outcomes will be PTL before 28, 32, 35, and 37 weeks of gestation; a composite of poor perinatal outcomes.
RESULTS
Results
The incidence of SPL at less than 37 weeks of gestation was occurred in 14,1% vs 29,3% (RR 0,48, 95% CI, 0,23-0,99), lower rate of SPL at less than 35 weeks of gestation (RR 0,30, 95% CI, 0,10-0,88), longer gestational age (Dif. -1,4, 95% CI, -2,30 to -0,50), higher birth weight (Dif. -197,9, 95% CI, -307,6 to -88,15), lower incidence of adverse composite perinatal outcome (RR 0,28, 95% CI, 0,1-0,81) from the pessary and control group respectively. The participants pessary clinical group had a higher rate than the control group of increased vaginal discharge (RR 1,31, 95% CI, 1,01-1,69), but no differences in pelvic discomfort (RR 0,54, 95% CI, 0,14-2,18), chorioamnionitis (RR 0,30, 95% CI, 0,06-1,44).
CONCLUSION
Conclusions
The women with prior SPL use of a CPP, resulted in a lower rate of SPL. The component in the successful results of preventive strategy SPL is consideration of vaginal microbiota and role of special trained staff for installation and care cervical pessary.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.