International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2015
Morphological analysis of the effects of intraoperative transrectal compression of the prostate during high-intensity focused ultrasound for localized prostate cancer.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shoji Sunao, Hashimoto Akio, Nakamoto Masahiko, Fukuda Norio, Fujikawa Hiroshi, Endo Kazuyuki, Tomonaga Tetsuro, Nakano Mayura, Terachi Toshiro, Uchida Toyoaki
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of transrectal compression of the prostate for intra-operative prostatic swelling and intraprostatic point shift during high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment of localized prostate cancer.
METHODS: Patients treated with whole-gland high-intensity focused ultrasound as primary monotherapy for localized prostate cancer were enrolled in the study. Using the standard and compression method, the volumes of degassed water in the balloon covering the high-intensity focused ultrasound probe were 50 mL and 80-160 mL, respectively. To identify prostatic swelling and shift during high-intensity focused ultrasound and the volume occupied by the non-enhanced area, three-dimensional prostate models were reconstructed using ultrasound and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
RESULTS: In comparison with the standard (n = 40) and compression (n = 48) methods, intraoperative increase in the prostate volume (21% vs 5.3%; P = 0.044), intraprostatic point shift (4 mm vs 2 mm, P = 0.040 in the transition zone; 3 mm vs 0 mm; P = 0.001 in the peripheral zone) and the volume occupied by the non-enhanced area (89% vs 96%; P = 0.001) were significantly suppressed. The biochemical disease-free survival rate in patients treated using the compression method was significantly improved relative to the standard method (92.6% vs 76.5%; P = 0.038). Regarding complications, there was no significant difference in the rate of urethral stricture (P = 0.9), urinary tract infection (P = 0.9), incontinence (P = 0.3), erectile dysfunction (P = 0.9) or recto-urethral fistula between the patients treated using the standard and compression methods.
CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative transrectal compression suppresses intraoperative increase in the prostate volume and intraprostatic point shift during high-intensity focused ultrasound, having the potential to achieve precise whole-gland and lesion-targeted focal therapy.
METHODS: Patients treated with whole-gland high-intensity focused ultrasound as primary monotherapy for localized prostate cancer were enrolled in the study. Using the standard and compression method, the volumes of degassed water in the balloon covering the high-intensity focused ultrasound probe were 50 mL and 80-160 mL, respectively. To identify prostatic swelling and shift during high-intensity focused ultrasound and the volume occupied by the non-enhanced area, three-dimensional prostate models were reconstructed using ultrasound and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
RESULTS: In comparison with the standard (n = 40) and compression (n = 48) methods, intraoperative increase in the prostate volume (21% vs 5.3%; P = 0.044), intraprostatic point shift (4 mm vs 2 mm, P = 0.040 in the transition zone; 3 mm vs 0 mm; P = 0.001 in the peripheral zone) and the volume occupied by the non-enhanced area (89% vs 96%; P = 0.001) were significantly suppressed. The biochemical disease-free survival rate in patients treated using the compression method was significantly improved relative to the standard method (92.6% vs 76.5%; P = 0.038). Regarding complications, there was no significant difference in the rate of urethral stricture (P = 0.9), urinary tract infection (P = 0.9), incontinence (P = 0.3), erectile dysfunction (P = 0.9) or recto-urethral fistula between the patients treated using the standard and compression methods.
CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative transrectal compression suppresses intraoperative increase in the prostate volume and intraprostatic point shift during high-intensity focused ultrasound, having the potential to achieve precise whole-gland and lesion-targeted focal therapy.