The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 1993
Continuous intrapartum fetal monitoring: a prospective randomized comparison of 2 types of fetal scalp electrode.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Peres M F, Fisher C C, Leader L R
Аннотация
This trial was conducted to compare 2 commonly used fetal scalp electrodes with regard to ease of use, frequency and extent of neonatal injury and quality of cardiotocographic record. A randomized design was employed to study a group of 106 patients divided between a Surgicraft Copeland clip fetal scalp electrode (52 patients) and a Meditrace spiral single helix scalp electrode (54 patients). Patients were eligible for trial entry if they required an intrapartum fetal scalp electrode, at term with a singleton cephalic pregnancy. Ease of application was rated by the operator using a linear analogue score. Unidentified traces were reviewed independently for quality by 2 obstetricians and neonates were examined on day-2 postpartum for injury. The Meditrace spiral fetal scalp electrode was significantly easier to apply (unpaired t-test p < 0.02). It also obtained higher ratings for trace quality (unpaired t-test p < 0.02). There were no serious neonatal injuries and no difference was found between the 2 electrodes in this regard.