MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1993.tb02111.x

Медицинская библиотека · The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 1993

Continuous intrapartum fetal monitoring: a prospective randomized comparison of 2 types of fetal scalp electrode.

Peres M F, Fisher C C, Leader L R

Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This trial was conducted to compare 2 commonly used fetal scalp electrodes with regard to ease of use, frequency and extent of neonatal injury and quality of cardiotocographic record. A randomized design was employed to study a group of 106 patients divided between a Surgicraft Copeland clip fetal scalp electrode (52 patients) and a Meditrace spiral single helix scalp electrode (54 patients). Patients were eligible for trial entry if they required an intrapartum fetal scalp electrode, at term with a singleton cephalic pregnancy. Ease of application was rated by the operator using a linear analogue score. Unidentified traces were reviewed independently for quality by 2 obstetricians and neonates were examined on day-2 postpartum for injury. The Meditrace spiral fetal scalp electrode was significantly easier to apply (unpaired t-test p < 0.02). It also obtained higher ratings for trace quality (unpaired t-test p < 0.02). There were no serious neonatal injuries and no difference was found between the 2 electrodes in this regard.

Для цитирования: Peres M F, Fisher C C, Leader L R. Continuous intrapartum fetal monitoring: a prospective randomized comparison of 2 types of fetal scalp electrode.. The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology. 1993. DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1993.tb02111.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.