DOI 10.1016/j.clinph.2025.2111003
Lower urinary tract sensory assessments in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction undergoing sacral neuromodulation.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of lower urinary tract electrical sensory assessment (LUTESA) in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) undergoing sacral neuromodulation (SNM).
METHODS
Sensory evoked potentials (SEPs), current perception (CPT) and pain (PT) thresholds were assessed using repetitive electrical stimulation at four different LUT locations in 46 patients (24 female) with refractory NLUTD before and after SNM testing. Group comparisons were performed between patients with predominant storage and those with predominant voiding symptoms, with additional analysis based on clinical response to SNM (responders: ≥50 % improvement in urological symptoms).
RESULTS
SEP analysis revealed a prominent N1 component, with largest amplitudes for bladder dome stimulation. Descriptive analyses revealed differences between patients with voiding and storage symptoms for CPTs, PTs and SEPs. Pre/post SNM there were some changes in the N1 topography and in the transition phase (following the N1 component). SNM responders exhibited lower sensory thresholds and more distinct classical SEP waveforms already at baseline, than non-responders.
CONCLUSIONS
LUTESA is feasible with elicitable SEPs pre/post SNM and differential manifestations for type of NLUTD. Further research on the predictive value of LUTESA for SNM success is warranted.
SIGNIFICANCE: LUTESA is feasible in patients with NLUTD and may help to better characterize patients for tailored treatment options.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.