Cross-Sectional Areas and Volumes Occupied by Implants in Simulated Scaphoid Fractures.

PURPOSE: This study determined the volume of bone replaced by an implant at the proximal and distal poles of simulated scaphoid fractures. We also measured the cross-sectional area of the implant relative to the cross-sectional area of the scaphoid at 2 different simulated fracture locations.

METHODS

Microcomputed tomograhy scans of 7 cadaveric scaphoids were used to create 3-dimensional models in which transverse proximal pole and midwaist fractures were simulated. The volume occupied by 5 commonly used implants and the cross-sectional area occupied at the surface of the fractures was measured using a computer modeling software.

RESULTS

For simulated proximal pole fractures, the implants replaced 1.5%-7.4% of the fracture cross-sectional area and 1.2%-6.4% of the proximal fragment bone volume. For midwaist fractures, the implants replaced 1.5%-6.8% of the fracture cross-sectional area and 1.8%-4.6% of the proximal pole volume. Although the different implant designs replaced different areas and volumes, all these differences were small and below 4%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides data that relate to one aspect of fracture healing, specifically, the surface area occupied by 5 different implants in proximal and midwaist scaphoid fractures as well as the volume of bone replaced by the implant.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: As opposed to the impression provided by 2-dimensional planar imaging, when studied using a 3-dimensional model, the volume and surface area replaced by an implant represent a minimal percentage of scaphoid bone, suggesting a negligible clinical effect.