MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1586/14737140.2014.965687

Медицинская библиотека · Expert review of anticancer therapy · 2014

Focal cryotherapy of localized prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Shah Taimur Tariq, Ahmed Hashim, Kanthabalan Abi, Lau Benjamin, Ghei Maneesh, Maraj Barry, Arya Manit

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Radical/whole gland treatment for prostate cancer has significant side-effects. Therefore focal treatments such as cryotherapy have been used to treat localized lesions whilst aiming to provide adequate cancer control with minimal side-effects. We performed a systematic review of Pubmed/Medline and Cochrane databases' to yield 9 papers for primary focal prostate cryotherapy and 2 papers for focal salvage treatment (radio-recurrent). The results of 1582 primary patients showed biochemical disease-free survival between 71-93% at 9-70 months follow-up. Incontinence rates were 0-3.6% and ED 0-42%. Recto-urethral fistula occurred in only 2 patients. Salvage focal cryotherapy had biochemical disease-free survival of 50-68% at 3 years. ED occurred in 60-71%. Focal cryotherapy appears to be an effective treatment for primary localized prostate cancer and compares favorably to radical/whole gland treatments in medium-term oncological outcomes and side-effects. Although more studies are needed it is also effective for radio-recurrent cancer with a low complications rates.

Для цитирования: Shah Taimur Tariq, Ahmed Hashim, Kanthabalan Abi, Lau Benjamin, Ghei Maneesh, Maraj Barry, Arya Manit. Focal cryotherapy of localized prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature.. Expert review of anticancer therapy. 2014. DOI: 10.1586/14737140.2014.965687.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.