MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/0363546512469092

Медицинская библиотека · The American journal of sports medicine · 2012

Biomechanical evaluation of transosseous rotator cuff repair: do anchors really matter?

Salata Michael J, Sherman Seth L, Lin Emery C, Sershon Robert A, Gupta Aman, Shewman Elizabeth, Wang Vincent M, Cole Brian J, Romeo Anthony A, Verma Nikhil N

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Suture anchor fixation has become the preferred method for arthroscopic repairs of rotator cuff tears. Recently, newer arthroscopic repair techniques including transosseous-equivalent repairs with anchors or arthroscopic transosseous suture passage have been developed.

PURPOSE: To compare the initial biomechanical performance including ultimate load to failure and localized cyclic elongation between transosseous-equivalent repair with anchors (TOE), traditional transosseous repair with a curved bone tunnel (TO), and an arthroscopic transosseous repair technique utilizing a simple (AT) or X-box suture configuration (ATX).

STUDY

DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Twenty-eight human cadaveric shoulders were dissected to create an isolated supraspinatus tear and randomized into 1 of 4 repair groups (TOE, TO, AT, ATX). Tensile testing was conducted to simulate the anatomic position of the supraspinatus with the arm in 60° of abduction and involved an initial preload, cyclic loading, and pull to failure. Localized elongation during testing was measured using optical tracking. Data were statistically assessed using analysis of variance with a Tukey post hoc test for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

The TOE repair demonstrated a significantly higher mean ± SD failure load (558.4 ± 122.9 N) compared with the TO (325.3 ± 79.9 N), AT (291.7 ± 57.9 N), and ATX (388.5 ± 92.6 N) repairs (P < .05). There was also a significantly larger amount of first-cycle excursion in the AT group (8.19 ± 1.85 mm) compared with the TOE group (5.10 ± 0.89 mm). There was no significant difference between repair groups in stiffness during maximum load to failure or in normalized cyclic elongation. Failure modes were as follows: TOE, tendon (n = 4) and bone (n = 3); TO, suture (n = 6) and bone (n = 1); AT, tendon (n = 2) and bone (n = 3) and suture (n = 1); ATX, tendon (n = 7).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that anchorless repair techniques using transosseous sutures result in significantly lower failure loads than a repair model utilizing anchors in a TOE construct.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Suture anchor repair appears to offer superior biomechanical properties to transosseous repairs regardless of tunnel or suture configuration.

Для цитирования: Salata Michael J, Sherman Seth L, Lin Emery C, Sershon Robert A, Gupta Aman, Shewman Elizabeth, Wang Vincent M, Cole Brian J, Romeo Anthony A, Verma Nikhil N. Biomechanical evaluation of transosseous rotator cuff repair: do anchors really matter?. The American journal of sports medicine. 2012. DOI: 10.1177/0363546512469092.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.