JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association · 2023
Peripartum Hysterectomy among Patients Admitted to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lama Sushma, Todi Sushila, Shrestha Reena, Acharya Swikrity
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Emergency peripartum hysterectomy is a life-saving procedure performed as an emergency procedure to control torrential bleeding and it is associated with significant maternal morbidity and mortality. There are only a few studies regarding this topic so this study guides us to monitor the trend and start appropriate policies to reduce unnecessary caesarean deliveries. The aim of this study was to find out the prevalence of peripartum hysterectomy among patients admitted to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology in a tertiary care centre.
METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the tertiary care centre. Data from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2022 were collected between 25 January 2023 and 28 February 2023 from the hospital records. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Committee of the same institute (Reference number: 2301241700). Convenience sampling was done. Point estimate and 95% Confidence Interval were calculated.
RESULTS: Among 54,045 deliveries, peripartum hysterectomy was seen in 40 (0.074%) (0.05-0.10, 95% Confidence Interval). The major indication of emergency peripartum hysterectomy was abnormal placentation (placenta accreta spectrum) which was 25 (62.50%) followed by uterine atony in 13 (32.50%) of patients and uterine rupture in 2 (5%).
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of peripartum hysterectomy was lower than in other studies done in similar settings. The indication for Emergency peripartum hysterectomy has changed in recent years from uterine atonicity to the morbidly adherent placenta which is due to a rise in the caesarean section rate.
KEYWORDS: caesarean section; hysterectomy; placenta accreta.
METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the tertiary care centre. Data from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2022 were collected between 25 January 2023 and 28 February 2023 from the hospital records. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Committee of the same institute (Reference number: 2301241700). Convenience sampling was done. Point estimate and 95% Confidence Interval were calculated.
RESULTS: Among 54,045 deliveries, peripartum hysterectomy was seen in 40 (0.074%) (0.05-0.10, 95% Confidence Interval). The major indication of emergency peripartum hysterectomy was abnormal placentation (placenta accreta spectrum) which was 25 (62.50%) followed by uterine atony in 13 (32.50%) of patients and uterine rupture in 2 (5%).
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of peripartum hysterectomy was lower than in other studies done in similar settings. The indication for Emergency peripartum hysterectomy has changed in recent years from uterine atonicity to the morbidly adherent placenta which is due to a rise in the caesarean section rate.
KEYWORDS: caesarean section; hysterectomy; placenta accreta.