Neurourology and urodynamics · 2020
Inter- and intrarater reliability of unidigital and bidigital vaginal palpation to evaluation of maximal voluntary contraction of pelvic floor muscles considering risk factors and dysfunctions.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
da Silva Jordana B, de Oliveira Sato Tatiana, Rocha Ana P R, Driusso Patricia
Аннотация
AIMS: To evaluate inter- and intrarater reliability of unidigital and bidigital vaginal palpation of pelvic floor muscle (PFM) maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) according to PFM risk factors and dysfunctions.
METHODS: A total of 187 women were recruited and evaluated by two examiners. Both performed the evaluation of MVC with unidigital and bidigital palpation, graded by Modified Oxford Scale. After 7-10 days, one examiner repeated the assessment. To analyze reliability by Cohen's linear Kappa (κw), participants were allocated into different groups according to: body mass index (BMI), menopause, parity, type of delivery and PFM dysfunctions, as pelvic organ prolapse (POP), constipation, urgency, urgency urinary incontinence, pelvic pain, and stress urinary incontinence.
RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability of unidigital palpation was considered fair (κw = 0.21-0.40) to moderate (κw = 0.41-0.60) according to BMI, postmenopausal status, parity, type of delivery, and PFM dysfunctions. Inter-rater reliability of bidigital palpation varied from none (κw = 0.00-0.20) to moderate for all risk factors and PFM dysfunctions. Intra-rater reliability of unidigital palpation was considered fair only for women with POP (κw = 0.37) and moderate to substantial (κw = 0.61-0.80) to all other variables. Intra-rater reliability of bidigital palpation ranged from moderate to almost perfect (κw = 0.81-1.00).
CONCLUSIONS: When performing vaginal palpation, physiotherapists must consider the way that is performing the evaluation, as some PFM risk factors and dysfunctions could influence the inter- and intrarater reliability of unidigital and bidigital palpation.
METHODS: A total of 187 women were recruited and evaluated by two examiners. Both performed the evaluation of MVC with unidigital and bidigital palpation, graded by Modified Oxford Scale. After 7-10 days, one examiner repeated the assessment. To analyze reliability by Cohen's linear Kappa (κw), participants were allocated into different groups according to: body mass index (BMI), menopause, parity, type of delivery and PFM dysfunctions, as pelvic organ prolapse (POP), constipation, urgency, urgency urinary incontinence, pelvic pain, and stress urinary incontinence.
RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability of unidigital palpation was considered fair (κw = 0.21-0.40) to moderate (κw = 0.41-0.60) according to BMI, postmenopausal status, parity, type of delivery, and PFM dysfunctions. Inter-rater reliability of bidigital palpation varied from none (κw = 0.00-0.20) to moderate for all risk factors and PFM dysfunctions. Intra-rater reliability of unidigital palpation was considered fair only for women with POP (κw = 0.37) and moderate to substantial (κw = 0.61-0.80) to all other variables. Intra-rater reliability of bidigital palpation ranged from moderate to almost perfect (κw = 0.81-1.00).
CONCLUSIONS: When performing vaginal palpation, physiotherapists must consider the way that is performing the evaluation, as some PFM risk factors and dysfunctions could influence the inter- and intrarater reliability of unidigital and bidigital palpation.