MedElevator
Войти в исследования Alternative therapies in health and medicine · 2024
Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Ectopic Tubal Pregnancy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chen Xinyu, Wu Qiong, Wei Na, An Guifang, Yu Hairong, Zhang Yuli, Wang Ning
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To explore whether contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can improve tubal ectopic pregnancy detection rate, tubal dilation, tubal hematoma, and gestational sac.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 34 patients with suspected ectopic pregnancy who underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasound at Dongzhimen Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine between March 2021 and September 2016. Of these, 27 patients were confirmed to have tubal pregnancy by laparoscopic surgery and histopathology. Four ultrasound physicians (2 experts and 2 non-experts) conducted a retrospective analysis of conventional color Doppler ultrasound and the combination of conventional color Doppler ultrasound with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (color Doppler ultrasound + CEUS). They analyzed the differences in confidence levels and reproducibility in identifying tubal dilation, tubal hematoma, and gestational sac implantation sites. Additionally, the characteristic features of ectopic pregnancy on contrast-enhanced ultrasound were summarized, including gestational sac morphology, triple ring sign, enhancement patterns (branching or punctate), tubal dilation (with or without hematoma), contrast enhancement of tubal walls, and presence of free fluid.
RESULTS: In the expert group, the correct identification rate of the gestational sac implantation site on ultrasound images increased from 13/34 (38.2%) with conventional color Doppler ultrasound to 20/34 (58.8%) with color Doppler ultrasound + CEUS, the differences were statistically significant (38.2% vs. 58.8%, P = .039). The correct identification rate of tubal dilation increased from 6/34 (17.7%) to 25/34 (73.5%) (P = .001), and the correct identification rate of tubal hematoma increased from 3/34 (8.8%) to 17/34 (50.0%) with color Doppler ultrasound + CEUS (P < .001). In the non-expert group, the correct identification rate of the gestational sac implantation site increased from 8/24 (23.5%) with conventional ultrasound to 19/34 (55.9%) with ultrasound + CEUS (P = .003). The correct identification rate of tubal dilation increased from 6/34 (17.7%) to 23/34 (67.7%) (P < .001), and the correct identification rate of tubal hematoma increased from 3/34 (8.82%) to 12/34 (35.3%) with color Doppler ultrasound + CEUS (P = .012).
CONCLUSION: The analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound images provides characteristic features and diagnostic points for tubal ectopic pregnancy, including gestational sac, thick ring sign, tubal dilation, and tubal dilation with hematoma. This approach improves the accuracy of partial pregnancy of unknown location (PUL) diagnosis and reduces the technical dependence on ultrasound personnel.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 34 patients with suspected ectopic pregnancy who underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasound at Dongzhimen Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine between March 2021 and September 2016. Of these, 27 patients were confirmed to have tubal pregnancy by laparoscopic surgery and histopathology. Four ultrasound physicians (2 experts and 2 non-experts) conducted a retrospective analysis of conventional color Doppler ultrasound and the combination of conventional color Doppler ultrasound with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (color Doppler ultrasound + CEUS). They analyzed the differences in confidence levels and reproducibility in identifying tubal dilation, tubal hematoma, and gestational sac implantation sites. Additionally, the characteristic features of ectopic pregnancy on contrast-enhanced ultrasound were summarized, including gestational sac morphology, triple ring sign, enhancement patterns (branching or punctate), tubal dilation (with or without hematoma), contrast enhancement of tubal walls, and presence of free fluid.
RESULTS: In the expert group, the correct identification rate of the gestational sac implantation site on ultrasound images increased from 13/34 (38.2%) with conventional color Doppler ultrasound to 20/34 (58.8%) with color Doppler ultrasound + CEUS, the differences were statistically significant (38.2% vs. 58.8%, P = .039). The correct identification rate of tubal dilation increased from 6/34 (17.7%) to 25/34 (73.5%) (P = .001), and the correct identification rate of tubal hematoma increased from 3/34 (8.8%) to 17/34 (50.0%) with color Doppler ultrasound + CEUS (P < .001). In the non-expert group, the correct identification rate of the gestational sac implantation site increased from 8/24 (23.5%) with conventional ultrasound to 19/34 (55.9%) with ultrasound + CEUS (P = .003). The correct identification rate of tubal dilation increased from 6/34 (17.7%) to 23/34 (67.7%) (P < .001), and the correct identification rate of tubal hematoma increased from 3/34 (8.82%) to 12/34 (35.3%) with color Doppler ultrasound + CEUS (P = .012).
CONCLUSION: The analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound images provides characteristic features and diagnostic points for tubal ectopic pregnancy, including gestational sac, thick ring sign, tubal dilation, and tubal dilation with hematoma. This approach improves the accuracy of partial pregnancy of unknown location (PUL) diagnosis and reduces the technical dependence on ultrasound personnel.