MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7759/cureus.81186

Медицинская библиотека · Cureus · 2025

Left Subclavian Vein Stenosis Secondary to Central Venous Access Placement: A Case Report.

González Martínez Abraham U, Durango Diomedes, Gonzalez Cristian F, Ramírez Riva Palacio Luis A, González Martínez Marco A

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Venous stenosis secondary to central venous access is a well-recognized complication. However, in patients without kidney disease or those not undergoing hemodialysis, central venous stenosis is less frequently reported, suggesting that while the condition is documented in these specific populations, it may be underreported in the general population with other characteristics. This study describes a 69-year-old patient with a history of thrombophilia due to MTHRF 677 gene heterozygous mutation, who developed left subclavian vein stenosis two weeks after the use of central vascular access, leading to left upper extremity edema, development of collateral venous network, and pain and dyspnea. Endovascular treatment was performed with recanalization and angioplasty of the subclavian vein, with favorable outcomes, improving symptoms in the immediate post-operative period and continuing through six-month follow-up with monthly consultation and phlebography control. The adequate response to this type of clinical situation with endovascular management and monotherapy with anticoagulant factor Xa inhibitor (apixaban) confirms this approach as another alternative within the field of vascular surgery.

Для цитирования: González Martínez Abraham U, Durango Diomedes, Gonzalez Cristian F, Ramírez Riva Palacio Luis A, González Martínez Marco A. Left Subclavian Vein Stenosis Secondary to Central Venous Access Placement: A Case Report.. Cureus. 2025. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.81186.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.